Cited by 126Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure

Fidelis, Krzysztof, Stern, Peter S., Bacon, David, Moult, John·1994·"Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"

Abstract

Two principal methods of determining the conformation of short pieces of polypeptide backbone in proteins have been developed: using a database of known structures and systematically generating all conformations. In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of these two techniques. The completeness of the database for segments of different lengths is examined and it is found to contain most conformations for segments seven residues long, but to deteriorate rapidly for longer regions. When the database segment is to be incorporated into the rest of a structure, at least seven residues are required to build four new residues, because of the need to position the segment relative to the rest of the structure. It is found that such positioning using flanking residues results in large errors in the inserted region. We conclude that the database method is currently not effective for comparative modeling, even for short segments. The systematic search procedure is found to generate almost all structures of short segments found in proteins. In contrast to the database method, low root mean square error structures are obtained for a set of trial segments embedded in the rest of a protein structure. Thus, it should be considered the method of choice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/7.8.953

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fidelis, K., Stern, P. S., Bacon, D., & Moult, J.
Affiliations
University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute (US)
Venue
"Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
Published
1994
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
953-960
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W1990698302
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01lm005102-03, 5r01gm041034-10)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM41034)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM05102)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
protein structure comparison, conformational space, structure database, comparative protein modeling, root mean square error
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Molecular, Peptide Fragments, Databases, Factual, Sequence Alignment, Protein Structure, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review