Cited by 143Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Effect of Duration of Upper- and Lower-Extremity Rehabilitation Sessions and Walking Speed on Recovery of Interlimb Coordination in Hemiplegic Gait

Open access
Kwakkel, Gert, Wagenaar, Robert C·2002·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The effects of different durations of rehabilitation sessions for the upper extremities (UEs) and lower extremities (LEs) on the recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait in patients who have had a stroke were investigated. Subjects and Methods. Fifty-three subjects who had strokes involving their middle cerebral arteries were assigned to rehabilitation programs with (1) an emphasis on the LEs, (2) an emphasis on the paretic UE, or (3) a condition in which the paretic arm (UE) and leg (LE) were immobilized with an inflatable pressure splint (control treatment). The 3 treatment regimens were applied for 30 minutes, 5 days a week, during the first 20 weeks after onset of stroke. All subjects also participated in a rehabilitation program 5 days a week that consisted of 15 minutes of UE exercises and 15 minutes of LE exercises in addition to a weekly 1½-hour session of training in activities of daily living. A repeated-measures design was used. Differences among the 3 treatment regimens were evaluated in terms of comfortable and maximal walking speeds. In addition, mean continuous relative phase (CRP) between paretic arm and leg (PAL) movements and nonparetic arm and leg (NAL) movements and standard deviations of CRP of both limb pairs as a measurement of stability (variability) were evaluated. Results. Comfortable walking speed improved in the group that received interventions involving the LEs compared with the group that received interventions involving the UEs and the group that received the control treatment. No differences among the 3 treatment conditions were found for the mean CRP of NAL and PAL as well as the standard deviation of CRP of both limb pairs. Discussion and Conclusion. With the exception of an improved comfortable walking speed as a result of a longer duration of rehabilitation sessions, no differential effects of duration of rehabilitation sessions for the LEs and UEs on the variable we measured related to hemiplegic gait were found. Increasing walking speed, however, resulted in a larger mean CRP for both limb pairs, with increased stability and asymmetry of walking, indicating that walking speed influences interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ptj/82.5.432

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Larger stride lengths on the nonparetic side contributed more to observed improvements in comfortable and maximal walking speed than measured kinematic changes on the paretic side in 53 patients with stroke.

    “Kwakkel et al 77 showed in 53 patients with stroke that larger stride lengths on the nonparetic side contributed more to observed improvements in comfortable and maximal walking speed than measured kinematic changes on the paretic side.77”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwakkel, G., & Wagenaar, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Kwakkel, Gert
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
432-448
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W2133313548
Cited by
143
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, hemiplegic gait, interlimb coordination, walking speed, upper limb rehabilitation, lower limb rehabilitation, middle cerebral artery stroke, continuous relative phase, gait asymmetry, activities of daily living training
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Analysis of Variance, Arm, Biomechanical Phenomena, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gait, Hemiplegia, Humans, Immobilization, Leg, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Posture, Pressure, Splints, Time Factors, Walking, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review