Predicting Improvement in Gait After Stroke: A Longitudinal Prospective Study
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— To study the longitudinal relationship of functional change in walking ability and change in time-dependent covariates and to develop a multivariate regression model to predict longitudinal change of walking ability. Methods— A total of 101 acute stroke patients with first-ever ischemic middle cerebral artery strokes was used as the population. Prospective cohort study based on 18 repeated measurements over time during the first poststroke year. Baseline characteristics as well as longitudinal information from functional ambulation categories (FAC), Fugl–Meyer leg score (FM-leg), Motricity index leg score (MI-leg), letter cancellation task (LCT), Fugl-Meyer balance (FM-balance), and timed balance test (TBT) were obtained. Intervention consisted of a basic rehabilitation program with additional arm, leg, or air splint therapy. Main outcome measure constituted change scores on FAC over time. Results— In total, 1532 of the 1717 change scores were available for regression analysis. The regression model showed that TBT change scores were the most important factor in predicting improvement on FAC (β=0.094; P <0.001) followed by changes scores on FM-leg (β=0.014; P <0.001) and reduction in LCT omissions (β=−0.010; P <0.001) and MI leg test (β=0.001; P <0.001). In addition, time itself was significantly negatively associated with improvement (β=−0.002; P <0.001). Conclusion— Improvement in standing balance control is more important than improvement in leg strength or synergism to achieve improvement in walking ability, whereas reduction in visuospatial inattention is independently related to improvement of gait. Finally, time itself is an independent covariate that is negatively associated with change on FAC, suggesting that most pronounced improvements occur earlier after stroke.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Everitt, B. S. (2001) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410605542-11 · Cited by 6,877 · see citing works
Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999) · Cited by 6,830 · see citing works
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology: A Practical Guide
Twisk, J. W. R. (2003) · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
Self-citationRecovery of walking function in stroke patients: The copenhagen stroke study
Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80038-7 · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial
Kwakkel, G., WAGENAAR, R. C., Twisk, J. W. R., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis.
Wade, D. T., & Hewer, R. L. (1987) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00282 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data
Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K. (1992) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780111406 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
de Haart, M., Geurts, A. C., Huidekoper, S. C., Fasotti, L., & van Limbeek, J. (2004) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.012 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables.
Brandstater, M. E., de Bruin, H., Gowland, C. A., & Bm, C. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Multilevel modelling of medical data
Goldstein, H., Browne, W. J., & Rasbash, J. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1264 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke.
Duncan, P. W., Goldstein, L. B., Horner, R. D., Landsman, P. B., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1994) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.25.6.1181 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Ma, D., Linder, M. T., & Sb, S. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 377 · see citing works
A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF SERIAL GAIT SPEED AS A MEASURE OF REHABILITATION IN THE ELDERLY
FRIEDMAN, P., Richmond, D., & BASKETT, J. J. (1988) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/17.4.227 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Garland, S. J., Willems, D. A., Ivanova, T. D., & Miller, K. J. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.002 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Kwakkel, G., & Wagenaar, R. C. (2002) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/82.5.432 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationObstacle crossing in subjects with stroke
Said, C. M., Goldie, P. A., Patla, A. E., et al. (1999) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90060-6 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The Process of Recovery: After Hemiplegia
NEWMAN, M. (1972) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.3.6.702 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Gresham, G. E. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.3.358 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients.
Berti, A., Smania, N., Rabuffetti, M., Ferrarin, M., Spinazzola, L., D'Amico, A., Ongaro, E., & Allport, A. (2002) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.16.3.390 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients.
Berti, A., Smania, N., Rabuffetti, M., et al. (2002) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.390 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Spatial neglect in acute stroke: the line bisection test
Pj, F. (2020) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/165019779022101106 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Understanding stroke recovery and rehabilitation: Current and emerging approaches
Dombovy, M. L. (2004) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-004-0008-6 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Intensive, time-series measurement of upper limb recovery in the subacute phase following stroke
Goodwin, N., & Sunderland, A. (2003) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215503cr571oa · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Twisk, J. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000238594.91938.1e · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence?
Kollen, B. J., Lennon, S., Lyons, B., Wheatley-Smith, L., Scheper, M., Buurke, J. H., Halfens, J., Geurts, A. C. H., & Kwakkel, G. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.533828 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Self-citationRecovery of Gait After Stroke: What Changes?
Buurke, J. H., Nene, A. V., Kwakkel, G., Erren-Wolters, V., IJzerman, M. J., & Hermens, H. J. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968308317972 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kollen, B., van de Port, I., Lindeman, E., Twisk, J., & Kwakkel, G.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- From the Research Bureau (B.K.), Isala klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands; Rehabilitation Centre “De Hoogstraat”, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht (I.v.d.P., E.L., G.K.), The Netherlands; and EMGO Institute/Department of KEB (J.T.), VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2676-2680
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2141036954
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.vu.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Stroke (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Keywords
- gait recovery, walking ability, Functional Ambulation Category, standing balance, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, leg strength, splint therapy, rehabilitation, ischemic stroke, middle cerebral artery stroke
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Gait, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Recovery of Function, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review