The Working Alliance in Client-Centered and Process-Experiential Therapy of Depression
Abstract
This study examined the development of the working alliance in process-experiential (PE) and client-centered therapy of depression. Thirty-four randomly assigned individuals completed 16 to 20 sessions of manual-based therapy. Results revealed the size of the alliance-outcome relation to be dependent on alliance dimension (goal, task, or bond), outcome measure (symptom improvement vs. self-esteem, relational problems), and time in treatment alliance. Part correlational analyses revealed that early alliance scores predicted outcomes that were not attributable to early mood changes. Although no group differences were found for bond and goal alliance, the PE group displayed higher task alliance scores in the midphase of therapy. The level of pretreatment depression did not affect alliance formation. The implications of these results are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The WAI-S shows acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83-0.98) and predictive validity related to therapy outcome.
“It shows acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.83–0.98) [57] and predictive validity related to therapy outcome [57,58,59].”
From A Randomized Pilot Study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to Improve Social Support for Veterans with PTSD (2022) · cites this paper as [59]
Cites
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696 · see citing works
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,872 · see citing works
Factor structure of the working alliance inventory
Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989) · Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.
Epstein, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy.
Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. B. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.61.4.561 · Cited by 1,283 · see citing works
Empathic: An Unappreciated Way of Being
Rogers, C. R. (1975) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/001100007500500202 · Cited by 1,276 · see citing works
Patterns of symptomatic recovery in psychotherapy.
Kopta, S. M., Howard, K. I., Lowry, J. L., & Beutler, L. E. (1994) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.62.5.1009 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM)
Agnew‐Davies, R., Stiles, W. B., Hardy, G. E., Barkham, M., & Shapiro, D. A. (1998) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01291.x · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Alliance and Outcome in Late-Life Depression
Marmar, C. R., Gaston, L., Gallagher-Thompson, D. E., & Thompson, L. W. (1989) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198908000-00003 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Stiles, W. B., Agnew-Davies, R., Hardy, G. E., Barkham, M., & Shapiro, D. A. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.66.5.791 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Rector, N. A., Zuroff, D. C., & Segal, Z. V. (1999) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/h0087739 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The meaning and reliability of accurate empathy ratings: A rejoinder.
Truax, C. B. (1972) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0032718 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form.
Busseri, M. A., & Tyler, J. D. (2003) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.193 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Kelly, M. M., Reilly, E. D., Ameral, V., Richter, S., & Fukuda, S. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11123482 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weerasekera, P., Linder, B., Greenberg, L., & Watson, J.
- ORCID
- Greenberg, L.
- Venue
- Psychotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-233
- ISSN
- 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4381
- OpenAlex
- W2025251840
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- therapeutic relationship, client-centered therapy, depression, treatment outcomes, self-esteem, relationship problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review