Cited by 337Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory, Short Form.

Busseri, Michael A., Tyler, John D.·2003·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) ratings were compared with ratings comprising the 12-item WAI, Short Form (WAI-S). Responses were collected from 54 university counseling center client-therapist pairs after the 4th therapy session as well as at a final ratings point. WAI and WAI-S scores were highly correlated and had comparable descriptive statistics, internal consistencies, and subscale intercorrelations within and across rater perspectives. Predictive validity estimates for WAI and WAI-S total scales were also very similar. Fourth-session WAI and WAI-S scores were moderately predictive of therapy improvement ratings. Results support the interchangeability of scores on the WAI and WAI-S scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.193

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Busseri, M. A., & Tyler, J. D.
Affiliations
University of North Dakota (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2003
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
193-197
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2049589547
Cited by
337
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Working Alliance Inventory, therapeutic relationship, counseling center clients, short-form scale, predictive validity, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Counseling, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review