The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*
Open accessAbstract
This article describes a new fact, then analyzes its causes and consequences: in most countries, import tariffs and nontariff barriers are substantially lower on dirty than on clean industries, where an industry’s “dirtiness” is defined as its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per dollar of output. This difference in trade policy creates a global implicit subsidy to CO2 emissions in internationally traded goods and contributes to climate change. This global implicit subsidy to CO2 emissions totals several hundred billion dollars annually. The greater protection of downstream industries, which are relatively clean, substantially accounts for this pattern. The downstream pattern can be explained by theories where industries lobby for low tariffs on their inputs but final consumers are poorly organized. A quantitative general equilibrium model suggests that if countries applied similar trade policies to clean and dirty goods, global CO2 emissions would decrease and global real income would change little.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also worth noting that existing trade policies, although not directly related to climate, affect global emissions: in most countries, import tariff and non-tariff barriers are substantially lower for dirty than for clean industries, which results in an implicit global subsidy to carbon emissions in internationally traded goods 17 .”
From Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem
Manski, C. F. (1993) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2298123 · Cited by 6,209
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 · Cited by 4,459
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676212 · Cited by 2,841
Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.87 · Cited by 1,989
On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.1.1 · Cited by 1,791
Consumption-based accounting of CO 2 emissions
Davis, S. J., & Caldeira, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906974107 · Cited by 1,759
New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?
Arkolakis, C., Costinot, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.94 · Cited by 1,707
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Grossman, 1994, Protection for Sale, American Economic Review, 84, 833
- Horowitz, 2006, Concepts and Methods of the U.S. Input-Output Accounts
- Maggi, 2016, Issue Linkage, 513
- Marvel, 1983, The Kennedy Round: Evidence on the Regulation of International Trade in the United States, American Economic Review, 73, 190
- Rodrik, 1995, Political Economy of Trade Policy, 1457
- Shapiro, 2016, Trade Costs, CO2, and the Environment, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8, 220
- Stern, 2006, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review
- Tukker, Arnold, Arjan de Koning, Richard Wood, Troy Hawkins, Stephan Lutter, Jose Acosta, Jose M. Rueda Cantuche, Maaike Bouwmeester, Jan Oosterhaven, Thomas Drosdowski, and Jeroen Kuenen, 2013, Economic Systems Research
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corporate Climate Risk: Measurements and Responses
Li, Q., Shan, H., Tang, Y., & Yao, V. W. (2020) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhad094 · Cited by 571
Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments
Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Rutherford, T. F. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01250-z · Cited by 292
Antràs, P., & Chor, D. (2022) · Handbook of international economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hesint.2022.02.005 · Cited by 216
Song, S., Lian, J., Skowronski, K., & Yan, T. (2023) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1272 · Cited by 184
The charm of green finance: Can green finance reduce corporate carbon emissions?
Zhao, X., Benkraiem, R., Abedin, M. Z., & Zhou, S. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107574 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, J. S.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shapiro, Joseph S
- ORCID
- Shapiro, Joseph S
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-12-16
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 831-886
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W3114459510
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.nber.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1850790)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Keywords
- trade policy, environmental bias, import tariffs, non-tariff barriers, CO2 emissions, heavily polluting industries, climate change, industry lobbying, general equilibrium model, international trade
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
