The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Unequal Gains from Product Innovations: Evidence from the U.S. Retail Sector*
Open accessAbstract
This article examines how product innovations led to inflation inequality in the United States from 2004 to 2015. Using scanner data from the retail sector, I find that annual inflation for retail products was 0.661 (std. err. 0.0535) percentage points higher for the bottom income quintile relative to the top income quintile. When including changes in product variety over time, this difference increases to 0.8846 (std. err. 0.0739) percentage points a year. In CEX-CPI data covering the full consumption basket, the annual inflation difference is 0.368 (std. err. 0.0502) percentage points. I investigate the following hypothesis: (i) the relative demand for products consumed by high-income households increased because of growth and rising inequality; (ii) in response, firms introduced more new products catering to such households; (iii) as a result, the prices of continuing products in these market segments fell due to increased competitive pressure. Using a shift-share research design, I find causal evidence that increasing relative demand leads to increasing product variety and lower inflation for continuing products. A calibration indicates that the hypothesized channel accounts for a large fraction (over 50%) of observed inflation inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,303
“A Model of Growth: Through Creative Destruction”
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951599 · Cited by 7,529
International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle
Vernon, R. (1966) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1880689 · Cited by 7,511
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OPTIMUM PRODUCT DIVERSITY
Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J. E., Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1975) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.268957 · Cited by 7,391
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Kuznets, S. (2024) · Business Cycle Theory, Part I Volume 4 · doi:10.4324/9781003549741-8 · Cited by 7,176
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
Robinson, J., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226398 · Cited by 6,529
A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1990) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3223 · Cited by 5,634
Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade
Krugman, P. R. (1979) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5 · Cited by 3,903
The Environment and Directed Technical Change
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.131 · Cited by 3,734
Cited by
Quasi-Experimental Shift-Share Research Designs
Borusyak, K., Hull, P., & Jaravel, X. (2022) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdab030 · Cited by 1,427
Self-citationUniform Pricing in US Retail Chains
DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · doi:10.3386/w23996 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaravel, X.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-12-04
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 715-783
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W3123044721
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 35.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Unequal Gains from Product Innovations: Evidence from the U.S. Retail Sector*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qje/qjy031
- The paper
- Jaravel, X. (2019). The Unequal Gains from Product Innovations: Evidence from the U.S. Retail Sector*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.