Cited by 1,030Global trade and economicsEconomic and Fiscal StudiesHistorical Economic and Social Studies

The Return to Protectionism*

Fajgelbaum, Pablo D, Goldberg, Pinelopi K, Kennedy, Patrick J, Khandelwal, Amit K·2020·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms that buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs. JEL Code: F1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjz036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Import tariffs increased from 2.6% to 16.6% on 12,043 products covering $303 billion (12.7%) of annual U.S. imports.

    “Import tariffs increased from 2.6% to 16.6% on 12,043 products covering $303 billion (12.7%) of annual U.S. imports (see Fajgelbaum et al., 2020).”

    From De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age (2020) · cites this paper as Fajgelbaum et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Khandelwal, Amit K
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2019-11-28
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
1-55
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2922100653
Cited by
1,030
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 229 · 2025: 243 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
136.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
import tariffs, retaliatory tariffs, protectionism, trade war, tariff pass-through, import prices, trade elasticity, general equilibrium model, income loss, political competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review