Cited by 43COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Psychosocial and coping responses toward 2019 coronavirus diseases (COVID-19): A cross-sectional study within the Chinese general population

Open access
Li, Q·2020·QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Background: The 2019 coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) led out the mental health crisis. Aim: To determine the psychological status and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSD) among general population (except confirmed and suspected cases, and close contacts) and their association with the coping strategy types during the COVID-19 outbreak. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: Participants were recruited from the community through snowball sampling with anonymous online questionnaires, using 28-item General Health Questionnaire, 22-item Impact of Events Scale-Revised and 28-item Brief Coping Inventory to measure their psychiatric disorders, PTSD level and coping strategies. Results: Of the total 1109 participants, 42.65% and 67.09% self-reported psychiatric disorders and high PTSD level, respectively. Age, occupation and education level were significantly association with psychological status. The status of psychiatric disorders was also significantly related to high PTSD level. Using both emotion and problem coping was better for psychiatric status [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54–0.98], and problem-focused coping was significantly associated with high PTSD level (aOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.25–3.51). Conclusion: Negative psychological outcomes were common among the general people during the COVID-19 outbreak, and the findings may provide references for intervention guidelines of mental health for the community population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa226

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Worldwide, use of positive-reframing, acceptance, and humor has been associated with better mental health during the pandemic, whereas use of passive and avoidant emotion-focused strategies (e.g., self-blame, venting, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction) has been associated with poorer mental health.

    “Worldwide, the use of some problem- and emotion-focused strategies such as positive-reframing, acceptance, and humor has been associated with better mental health during the pandemic, whereas the use of passive and avoidant emotion-focused strategies (e.g., self-blame, venting, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction) has been associated with poorer mental health [32,33,34,35]”

    From Gender Differences in Coping and Psychological Adaptation during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Li S, Wang Y, Yang Y, Lei X, Yang Y. Investigation on the influ- encing factors for anxiety related emotional disorders of chil- dren and adolescents with home quarantine during teh prevalence of coronavirus diseases 2019. Chin J Child Health Care 2020; 28:407-10.
  2. Wang Y, Yang Y, Li S, Lei X, Yang Y. Investigation on the sta- tus and influencing factors for depression symptom of chil- dren and adolescents with home quarantine during the prevalence of novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Child Health Care 2020; 28:277-80.
  3. Weiss D, Marmar C. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD: A Practitioner's Handbook. New York, Cuilford Press, 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q.
Affiliations
Guangxi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Q
ORCID
Li, Q
Venue
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-07-17
Volume
113
Issue
10
Pages
731-738
ISSN
  • 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2725
  • 1460-2393
OpenAlex
W3042858558
Cited by
43
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • QJM (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, posttraumatic stress symptoms, coping strategies, mental illness, mental health, general population, problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, psychological distress, Chinese population
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, China, Community Mental Health Services, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Coronavirus Infections, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review