The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Africa Need a Rotten Kin Theorem? Experimental Evidence from Village Economies
Abstract
This article measures the economic impacts of social pressure to share income with kin and neighbours in rural Kenyan villages. We conduct a lab experiment in which we randomly vary the observability of investment returns to test whether subjects reduce their income in order to keep it hidden. We find that women adopt an investment strategy that conceals the size of their initial endowment in the experiment, though that strategy reduces their expected earnings. This effect is largest among women with relatives attending the experiment. Parameter estimates suggest that women anticipate that observable income will be “taxed” at a rate above 4%; this effective tax rate nearly doubles when kin can observe income directly. At the village level, we find an association between the willingness to forgo expected return to keep income hidden in the laboratory experiment and worse economic outcomes outside the laboratory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.21.2.153 · Cited by 2,668
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555217 · Cited by 1,288
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population
von Gaudecker, H.-M., van Soest, A., & Wengström, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.664 · Cited by 349
Choi, S., Kariv, S., Müller, W., & Silverman, D. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.6.1518 · Cited by 277
Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games
Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Palfrey, T. R. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0899-8256(03)00052-6 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Underinvestment in a Profitable Technology: The Case of Seasonal Migration in Bangladesh
(2014) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10489 · Cited by 710
Savings by and for the Poor: A Research Review and Agenda
Karlan, D., Ratan, A. L., & Zinman, J. (2014) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/roiw.12101 · Cited by 548
Behavioral development economics
Kremer, M., Rao, G., & Schilbach, F. (2019) · Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1 · doi:10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.12.002 · Cited by 188
Returns to microcredit, cash grants and training for male and female microentrepreneurs in Uganda
Fiala, N. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.027 · Cited by 105
Stimulating Microenterprise Growth: Results from a Loans, Grants and Training Experiment in Uganda
Fiala, N. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2358086 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakiela, P., & Ozier, O.
- Venue
- The Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-09-17
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-268
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-937X
- OpenAlex
- W1489307190
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 92.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Africa Need a Rotten Kin Theorem? Experimental Evidence from Village Economies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/restud/rdv033
- The paper
- Jakiela, P., & Ozier, O. (2016). Does Africa Need a Rotten Kin Theorem? Experimental Evidence from Village Economies. The Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.