Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 869

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios

Elton, Edwin J., Gruber, Martin J., Das, Sanjiv, Hlavka, Matthew·1993·Review of Financial Studies

Abstract

We investigate the informational efficiency of mutual fund performance for the period 1965–84. Results are shown to be sensitive to the measurement of performance chosen. Wefind that returns on S&P stocks, returns on non-S&P stocks, and returns on bonds are significant factors in performance assessment. Once we correct for the impact of non-S&P assets on mutual fund returns, wefind that mutual funds do not earn returns that justify their information acquisition costs. This is consistent with results for prior periods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/6.1.1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 869

Metadata

Authors
Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Das, S., & Hlavka, M.
Venue
Review of Financial Studies
Published
1993-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
OpenAlex
W1991675125
Cited by
869
References
3
FWCI
22.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/6.1.1
The paper
Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Das, S., & Hlavka, M. (1993). Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.