The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cash Holdings and Credit Risk
Abstract
Intuition suggests that firms with higher cash holdings should be "safer" and have lower credit spreads. Yet empirically, the correlation between cash and spreads is robustly positive. This puzzling finding can be explained by the precautionary motive for saving cash, which in our model causes riskier firms to accumulate higher cash reserves. In contrast, spreads are negatively related to the part of cash holdings that is not determined by credit risk factors. Similarly, although firms with higher cash reserves are less likely to default in the short term, endogenously determined liquidity may be related positively to the longer-term probability of default. Our empirical analysis confirms these predictions, suggesting that precautionary savings are central to understanding the effects of cash on credit risk. The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com., Oxford University Press.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., Blinder, A. S., & Poterba, J. M. (1988) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534426 · Cited by 5,574
Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments
Staiger, D., & Stock, J. (1994) · doi:10.3386/t0151 · Cited by 5,302
The Determinants of Corporate Liquidity: Theory and Evidence
Kim, C.-S., Mauer, D. C., & Sherman, A. E. (1998) · The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.2307/2331099 · Cited by 1,244
Cited by
Dynamic Models and Structural Estimation in Corporate Finance
Strebulaev, I. A. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Finance · doi:10.1561/0500000035 · Cited by 259
Self-citationTrust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance
Amiraslani, H., Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2023) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09646-0 · Cited by 222
Farre-Mensa, J., Michaely, R., & Schmalz, M. (2025) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109024000231 · Cited by 54
Capital Structure and Default Risk: Evidence from Korean Stock Market
Graduate School, D. U., GUL, S., & CHO, H.-R. (2019) · The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business · doi:10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.15 · Cited by 28
How Does Corporate Governance Affect Equity Volatility? Worldwide Evidence and Theory
Gagnon, L., & Jeanneret, A. (2025) · The Review of Corporate Finance Studies · doi:10.1093/rcfs/cfad002 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Acharya, V., Davydenko, S. A., & Strebulaev, I. A.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-15
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3572-3609
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W3121238216
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 63.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cash Holdings and Credit Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhs106
- The paper
- Acharya, V., Davydenko, S. A., & Strebulaev, I. A. (2012). Cash Holdings and Credit Risk. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.