Cited by 190Advanced Glycation End Products researchBiomarkers in Disease MechanismsInflammation biomarkers and pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products: a new biomarker in diagnosis and prognosis of chronic inflammatory diseases

Maillard-Lefebvre, H., Boulanger, E., Daroux, M., Gaxatte, C., Hudson, B. I., Lambert, M.·2009·Rheumatology

Abstract

The formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) is a result of the non-enzymatic reaction between sugars and free amino groups of proteins. AGEs, through interacting with their specific receptor for AGEs (RAGE), result in activation of pro-inflammatory states and are involved in numerous pathologic situations. The soluble form of RAGE (sRAGE) is able to act as a decoy to avoid interaction of RAGE with its pro-inflammatory ligands (AGEs, HMGB1, S100 proteins). sRAGE levels have been found to be decreased in chronic inflammatory diseases including atherosclerosis, diabetes, renal failure and the aging process. The use of measuring circulating sRAGEs may prove to be a valuable vascular biomarker and in this review, we describe the implications of sRAGE in inflammation and propose that this molecule may represent a future therapeutic target in chronic inflammatory diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/kep199

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soluble forms of RAGE competitively bind AGEs, preventing their interaction with mRAGE and activation of downstream pathways including pro-inflammatory responses.

    “Furthermore, the soluble forms of the RAGE competitively bind AGEs preventing their interaction with mRAGE and the activation of downstream pathways, including pro-inflammatory responses.[42,43]”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2008, Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD, 19, 129

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maillard-Lefebvre, H., Boulanger, E., Daroux, M., Gaxatte, C., Hudson, B. I., & Lambert, M.
Affiliations
Université de Lille (FR)
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
2009-07-09
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1190-1196
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2150894134
Cited by
190
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lara D. Veeken (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products, advanced glycation end products, chronic inflammatory diseases, biomarkers, inflammation, atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, aging, HMGB1, S-100 protein, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products, Animals, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Chronic Disease, Humans, Inflammation, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Prognosis, Receptors, Immunologic, Vascular Diseases, Biomarkers, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review