The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Deficits in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients: A Meta-analytic Review of Putative Endophenotypes
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive deficits may index genetic liability for schizophrenia and are candidate endophenotypes for the illness. In order to compare the degree of sensitivity among cognitive tasks to group differences between healthy relatives and controls and the influence of moderator variables, this review reports mean effect sizes for 43 cognitive test scores from 58 studies of cognitive performance in the unaffected adult relatives of schizophrenia patients. Results indicate reliable relative-control differences, in the small to medium effect size range, over a diverse array of tasks, with the largest effect sizes seen in complex versions of continuous performance tasks, auditory verbal learning, design copy tests, and category fluency. Three study design features were found to have significant effects on overall effect size magnitude: groups unmatched on education, groups unmatched on age, and asymmetric psychiatric exclusion criteria. After excluding studies with the latter 2 design features, reliable performance differences were still observed over a smaller subset of cognitive test variables, with the largest effect sizes seen in Trails B (d = 0.50) and performance measures from both simple (d = 0.56) and complex (d = 0.60-0.66) versions of continuous performance tasks. Four of the 6 largest effect sizes reflect tasks with high executive control demands in common, such as working memory demands, set shifting, and inhibition of prepotent responses. Cognitive deficits, particularly those tapping such executive control functions, should continue to prove valuable as endophenotypes of interest in the search for specific genetic factors related to schizophrenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Endophenotype Concept in Psychiatry: Etymology and Strategic Intentions
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636 · Cited by 5,615
A continuous performance test of brain damage
Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome, E. D., & Beck, L. H. (1956) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043220 · Cited by 2,261
The Genetics of Schizophrenia: A Current, Genetic-epidemiologic Perspective
Kendler, K. S., & Diehl, S. R. (1993) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/19.2.261 · Cited by 568
Alterations in theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and non‐psychotic relatives
Janssen, I., Krabbendam, L., Jolles, J., & Van Os, J. (2003) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00092.x · Cited by 263
Different trait markers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a neurocognitive approach
KÉRI, S., KELEMEN, O., BENEDEK, G., & JANKA, Z. (2001) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291701004068 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Thermenos, H. W., Milanovic, S., Tsuang, M. T., Faraone, S. V., McCarley, R. W., Shenton, M. E., Green, A. I., Nieto-Castanon, A., LaViolette, P., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809141106 · Cited by 1,435
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20087 · Cited by 1,377
Dickinson, D., Ramsey, M. E., & Gold, J. M. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.532 · Cited by 863
Cognition in schizophrenia: core psychological and neural mechanisms
Barch, D. M., & Ceaser, A. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.015 · Cited by 747
CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls
Stefansson, H., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Steinberg, S., Magnusdottir, B., Morgen, K., Arnarsdottir, S., Bjornsdottir, G., Walters, G. B., Jonsdottir, G. A., Doyle, O. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12818 · Cited by 699
Metadata
- Authors
- Snitz, B. E.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-194
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2148772507
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Deficits in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients: A Meta-analytic Review of Putative Endophenotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/sbi048
- The paper
- Snitz, B. E. (2005). Cognitive Deficits in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients: A Meta-analytic Review of Putative Endophenotypes. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbi048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.