Cited by 568Schizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The Genetics of Schizophrenia: A Current, Genetic-epidemiologic Perspective

Kendler, K. S., Diehl, S. R.·1993·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

In the "Special Report on Schizophrenia" published in the Schizophrenia Bulletin in 1987, the genetic basis of schizophrenia was reviewed. Here, we provide our perspective on the current status of this area of investigation, focusing largely but not exclusively on recent findings. Methodologically rigorous family studies have now clearly shown that schizophrenia substantially aggregates in families. Familial factors that predispose to schizophrenia also increase the risk for certain schizophrenia-related personality disorders and probably for some forms of non-schizophrenic nonaffective psychosis. Results from one new twin study and updates from two ongoing adoption studies continue to support the hypothesis that genetic factors play a major role in the etiology of schizophrenia. Little is known about how genetic liability to schizophrenia is transmitted, although statistical models suggest that transmission is probably not due solely to a single major gene. Schizophrenia is clearly a complex disorder in that gene carriers need not manifest the illness (incomplete penetrance), affected individuals need not have the gene (environmental forms of phenocopies), diagnostic uncertainties cannot be avoided, and different families may carry different susceptibility genes (genetic heterogeneity). Therefore, segregation or linkage analyses are far more difficult to perform with schizophrenia than with Mendelian genetic disorders. Given this complexity, it is not too surprising that no…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/19.2.261

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our confidence in scientific results should increase when similar answers are obtained by different methods, especially when these 2 methods have different strengths and weaknesses.

    “Our confidence in scientific results should increase when similar answers are obtained by different methods, especially when these 2 methods have different strengths and weaknesses, for example, in the congruent evidence of genetic influences on schizophrenia from twin and adoption studies.53”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendler, K. S., & Diehl, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Kendler, K. S.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
261-285
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W1976408965
Cited by
568
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
23.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McMaster University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh045390-10)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH041953, MH41953, MH-45390)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
schizophrenia genetics, genetic epidemiology
MeSH terms
Diseases in Twins, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review