The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized and Specific Cognitive Performance in Clinical High-Risk Cohorts: A Review Highlighting Potential Vulnerability Markers for Psychosis
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive deficits are a core feature of established psychotic illnesses. However, the association between cognition and emerging psychosis is less understood. While there is some evidence that cognitive deficits are present prior to the onset of psychosis, findings are not consistent. In this article we provide an overview of the more general cognitive findings available from genetic high-risk studies, retrospective studies, and birth cohort studies. We then focus the review on neuropsychological performance in clinically "at-risk" groups. Overall, general cognitive ability as assessed by established batteries appears to remain relatively intact in these ultra-high risk cohorts and is a poor predictor close to illness onset relative to other vulnerability factors. Further decline may occur with illness progression, more consistent with state relative to trait factors. In addition, most established cognitive tasks involve several relatively discrete cognitive subprocesses, where findings from general batteries of subtests may mask specific deficits. In this context, our review suggests that relatively specific olfactory identification and spatial working memory deficits exist prior to illness onset and may be more potent trait markers for psychosis than cognitively dense tasks such as verbal memory. Suggestions for further research address the importance of standardization of inclusion criteria and the maintenance of basic neuropsychological assessment to allow better comparison of findings across centers. Further, in order to better understand the aetiopathology of cognitive dysfunction in psychosis, more experimental, hypothesis-driven measures of discrete cognitive processes are required. Delineation of the relationship between specific cognitive ability and symptoms from data-driven approaches may improve our understanding of the role of cognition during psychosis onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., & Dann, M. (1984) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5 · Cited by 1,854
The Prodromal Phase of First-episode Psychosis: Past and Current Conceptualizations
Yung, A. R., & McGorry, P. D. (1996) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/22.2.353 · Cited by 1,168 · cited 1×
“The Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation (PACE) Clinic, established in Melbourne, Australia, in 1994, was the first to specifically target adolescents in a putative prodromal phase.(22) The strategy focuses on individuals in the peak age range of risk for onset of psychotic disorder—adolescents and young adults.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCornblatt, B. A., Risch, N. J., Faris, G., Friedman, D., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1988) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(88)90076-5 · Cited by 682
Self-citationPremorbid Social Functioning in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Similarities and Differences
Cannon, M., Jones, P., Gilvarry, C., Rifkin, L., McKenzie, K., Foerster, A., & Murray, R. M. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.11.1544 · Cited by 345
A Role for the Hippocampus in Card Sorting?
Corcoran, R., & Upton, D. (1993) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80182-7 · Cited by 195
Prodromal interventions for schizophrenia vulnerability: the risks of being “at risk”
Corcoran, C., Malaspina, D., & Hercher, L. (2005) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.021 · Cited by 183
Foerster, A., Lewis, S. W., Owen, M. J., & Murray, R. M. (1991) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/0920-9964(91)90049-w · Cited by 95
Cited by
The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia: Version III--The Final Common Pathway
Howes, O. D., & Kapur, S. (2009) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp006 · Cited by 2,693
Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review.
Mesholam-Gately, R. I., Giuliano, A. J., Goff, K. P., Faraone, S. V., & Seidman, L. J. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0014708 · Cited by 1,130
Cognitive Functioning in Prodromal Psychosis: A Meta-analysis
Fusar-Poli, P., Deste, G., Smieskova, R., Barlati, S., Yung, A. R., Howes, O., Stieglitz, R.-D., Vita, A., McGuire, P., & Borgwardt, S. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1592 · Cited by 691
Self-citationDeclining Transition Rate in Ultra High Risk (Prodromal) Services: Dilution or Reduction of Risk?
Yung, A. R., Yuen, H. P., Berger, G., Francey, S., Hung, T.-C., Nelson, B., Phillips, L., & McGorry, P. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm015 · Cited by 416
Self-citationNeuroanatomy of vulnerability to psychosis: A voxel-based meta-analysis
Fusar-Poli, P., Borgwardt, S., Crescini, A., Deste, G., Kempton, M. J., Lawrie, S., Mc Guire, P., & Sacchetti, E. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.005 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, W. J., Wood, S. J., Phillips, L. J., Francey, S. M., Pantelis, C., Yung, A. R., Cornblatt, B., & McGorry, P. D.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 538-555
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2155515198
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized and Specific Cognitive Performance in Clinical High-Risk Cohorts: A Review Highlighting Potential Vulnerability Markers for Psychosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/sbj077
- The paper
- Brewer, W. J., Wood, S. J., Phillips, L. J., Francey, S. M., Pantelis, C., Yung, A. R., Cornblatt, B., & McGorry, P. D. (2005). Generalized and Specific Cognitive Performance in Clinical High-Risk Cohorts: A Review Highlighting Potential Vulnerability Markers for Psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbj077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.