Cited by 164Medication Adherence and ComplianceSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Medication Adherence in Schizophrenia: Exploring Patients', Carers' and Professionals' Views

Open access
Kikkert, M. J., Schene, A. H., Koeter, M. W. J., Robson, D., Born, A., Helm, H., Nose, M., Goss, C. +2 more·2005·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

One of the major clinical problems in the treatment of people with schizophrenia is suboptimal medication adherence. Most research focusing on determinants of nonadherence use quantitative research methods. These studies have some important limitations in exploring the decision-making process of patients concerning medication. In this study we explore factors influencing medication adherence behavior in people with schizophrenia using concept mapping. Concept mapping is a structured qualitative method and was performed in 4 European countries. Participants were 27 patients with schizophrenia, 29 carers, and 28 professionals of patients with schizophrenia. Five clinically relevant themes were identified that affect adherence: medication efficacy, external factors (such as patient support and therapeutic alliance), insight, side effects, and attitudes toward medication. Importance ratings of these factors differed significantly between professionals and carers and patients. Professionals, carers, and patients do not have a shared understanding of which factors are important in patients' medication adherence behavior. Adherence may be positively influenced if professionals focus on the positive aspects of medication, on enhancing insight, and on fostering a positive therapeutic relationship with patients and carers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbl011

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kikkert, M. J., Schene, A. H., Koeter, M. W. J., Robson, D., Born, A., Helm, H., Nose, M., Goss, C., Thornicroft, G., & Gray, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2005-10-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
786-794
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2114947270
Cited by
164
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
medication adherence, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Attitude of Health Personnel, Awareness, Concept Formation, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Refusal, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review