The DOI matches its Crossref record; 232 of the 233 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dysconnection in Schizophrenia: From Abnormal Synaptic Plasticity to Failures of Self-monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Over the last 2 decades, a large number of neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies of patients with schizophrenia have furnished in vivo evidence for dysconnectivity, ie, abnormal functional integration of brain processes. While the evidence for dysconnectivity in schizophrenia is strong, its etiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and significance for clinical symptoms are unclear. First, dysconnectivity could result from aberrant wiring of connections during development, from aberrant synaptic plasticity, or from both. Second, it is not clear how schizophrenic symptoms can be understood mechanistically as a consequence of dysconnectivity. Third, if dysconnectivity is the primary pathophysiology, and not just an epiphenomenon, then it should provide a mechanistic explanation for known empirical facts about schizophrenia. This article addresses these 3 issues in the framework of the dysconnection hypothesis. This theory postulates that the core pathology in schizophrenia resides in aberrant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-mediated synaptic plasticity due to abnormal regulation of NMDARs by neuromodulatory transmitters like dopamine, serotonin, or acetylcholine. We argue that this neurobiological mechanism can explain failures of self-monitoring, leading to a mechanistic explanation for first-rank symptoms as pathognomonic features of schizophrenia, and may provide a basis for future diagnostic classifications with physiologically defined patient subgroups. Finally, we test the explanatory power of our theory against a list of empirical facts about schizophrenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Computational psychiatry studies have done exactly this – for instance, using conductance-based neural mass models to infer synaptic changes in disorders like schizophrenia from M/EEG recordings (25, 26).”
From Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“It is of interest to note that similar Bayesian theories have previously been stated in the context of schizophrenia (63, 68, 89–92).”
From Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice? (2016) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“This model, and variants thereof, has already found widespread application to other psychiatric disorders with perceptual aberrations, in particular schizophrenia (63, 89, 90, 92, 107).”
From Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice? (2016) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“A prominent and consistent pathophysiological characteristic that has emerged in schizophrenia involves impaired synaptic connectivity (Stephan et al., 2009)”
From Perineuronal nets and schizophrenia: The importance of neuronal coatings (2014) · cites this paper as Stephan et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“A prominent and consistent pathophysiological characteristic that has emerged in schizophrenia involves impaired synaptic connectivity (Stephan et al., 2009)”
From Perineuronal nets and schizophrenia: The importance of neuronal coatings (2014) · cites this paper as Stephan et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Overall, studies conducted in SCZ suggest that this dysconnectivity may rely at the microscale on impaired control of synaptic plasticity, 40 notably of NMDAdependent plasticity.41,42”
From Are hallucinations due to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory influences on the brain? (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Others have linked hallucinations to a failure to attenuate the sensory consequences of inner speech, in analogy to the mechanism that is thought to underlie delusions of control.42,124,135”
From Are hallucinations due to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory influences on the brain? (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Such a possibility would be akin to the cycles of demyelination and remyelination often experienced by patients with multiple sclerosis 72 : cycles that have been shown to be associated with fluctuations in conduction velocity 46 and symptomatology, including psychotic symptomatology.[73][74][75]”
From Schizophrenia, myelination, and delayed corollary discharges: a hypothesis (2012) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
A JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Lindemann, L., Jaeschke, G., Michalon, A., Vieira, E., Honer, M., Spooren, W., Porter, R., Hartung, T., Kolczewski, S., Büttelmann, B., et al. (1909) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1909.02550020033007 · Cited by 7,889
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Self-citationA theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Self-citationDementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias
(1951) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1951.02920270079043 · Cited by 4,407
Recent advances in the phencyclidine model of schizophrenia
(1991) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.148.10.1301 · Cited by 2,904
Kapur, S. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13 · Cited by 2,813
Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(78)90006-9 · Cited by 2,725
Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00622503 · Cited by 2,655
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Friston, 1995, Clinical neuroscience (New York, N.Y.), 3, 89
- Olney, 1995, Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 998, 10.1001/archpsyc.52.12.998 · DOI
- 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360, 815
- 2000, PNAS, 97, 3661, 10.1073/pnas.050350297 · DOI
- 2000, 27, 349
- 1995, International clinical psychopharmacology, 10, 87
- 2000, Psychological medicine, 3, 1131
- 2007, 55, 919
- 2000, 27, 611
- 2007, 18, 159
- 1999, 22, 615
- Bentaleb, 2002, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 27, 110
- 2005, 46, 681
- 2007, Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum, 72, 269
- 2000, 28, 53
- 2003, 39, 641
- Arnold, 1991, Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 625, 10.1001/archpsyc.48.7.625 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Neural Connectivity during Multisensory Episodic Memory in Schizophrenia
Moran, Z. D. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephan, K. E., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stephan, K. E.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-03-30
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 509-527
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC2669579
- OpenAlex
- W2095651675
- Semantic Scholar
- 8cfeb68228d86d29ef7a86331cbc4aefac1a2e9b
- Cited by
- 1,134
- References
- 233
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (056750, 088130)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, dysconnectivity
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholine, Awareness, Brain, Delusions, Dopamine, Electroencephalography, Hallucinations, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Reality Testing, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Serotonin, Synapses, Magnetoencephalography, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review