The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivational Interviewing to Increase Cognitive Rehabilitation Adherence in Schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Adherence to treatment in psychiatric populations is notoriously low. In this randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study, we sought to examine whether motivational interviewing (MI) could be used to enhance motivation for, adherence to, and benefit obtained from cognitive rehabilitation. Dual diagnosis MI, developed specifically for individuals with psychotic symptoms and disorganization, was further adapted to focus on cognitive impairments and their impact. Sixty-four outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders completed baseline assessments and were randomized to receive either the 2-session MI focused on cognitive functioning or a 2-session sham control interview focused on assessment and feedback about preferred learning styles. Next, all participants were given 4 weeks during which they could attend up to 10 sessions of a computer-based math training program, which served as a brief analog for a full course of cognitive rehabilitation. As hypothesized, MI condition was associated with greater increases in task-specific motivation along with greater training program session attendance. Moreover, postinterview motivation level predicted session attendance. There were no significant differences in improvement on a measure of cognitive training content, which may have been due to the abbreviated nature of the training. While the literature on the efficacy of MI for individuals with psychosis has been mixed, we speculate that our positive findings may have been influenced by the adaptations made to MI as well as the focus on a nonpharmacological intervention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Withdrawal from intervention is also a widely recognised challenge in this population [81].”
From An enhanced individual placement and support (iPS) intervention based on the model of human occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
(2013) · Cited by 2,393
Hettema, J., Steele, J., & Miller, W. R. (2005) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143833 · Cited by 1,803
A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: Methodology and Effect Sizes
Wykes, T., Huddy, V., Cellard, C., McGurk, S. R., & Czobor, P. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855 · Cited by 1,693
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.843 · Cited by 1,575
Keefe, R. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.011 · Cited by 1,573
Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., & Heaton, R. K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009 · Cited by 1,422
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t07827-000 · Cited by 1,403
A Meta-Analysis of Motivational Interviewing: Twenty-Five Years of Empirical Studies
Lundahl, B. W., Kunz, C., Brownell, C., Tollefson, D., & Burke, B. L. (2010) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731509347850 · Cited by 1,086
The Expert Consensus Guideline Series
Velligan, D. I., Weiden, P. J., Sajatovic, M., Scott, J. L., Carpenter, D., Ross, R., & Docherty, J. P. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.7090su1cj · Cited by 692
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Tani, A. (2025) · International Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · doi:10.1007/s41811-025-00270-3
Reddy, L. F., Glynn, S. M., Iglesias, J., Sugar, C. A., & Green, M. F. (2026) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20250293
Ahondo, K., Oker, A., & Berjot, S. (2026) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2026.03.013
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiszdon, J. M., Kurtz, M. M., Choi, J., Bell, M. D., & Martino, S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Wesleyan University (US)
- Hartford Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fiszdon, Joanna M.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-09-29
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-334
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC4753608
- OpenAlex
- W2306067812
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I21 RX000598)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- motivational interviewing, cognitive rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Mathematics, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Schizophrenia, Treatment Outcome, Cognitive Dysfunction, Motivational Interviewing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review