Cited by 10Schizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

No Evidence for Widespread Positive Selection Signatures in Common Risk Alleles Associated with Schizophrenia

Open access
Yao, Yao, Yang, Jia, Xie, Yimin, Liao, Hai, Yang, Baoying, Xu, Qi, Rao, Shuquan·2020·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Schizophrenia poses an evolutionary-genetic paradox as it exhibits strongly negative fitness effects (early mortality and decreased fecundity), yet it persists at a prevalence of approximately 1% worldwide. Evidence from several studies have suggested that schizophrenia is evolved and maintained in part as a maladaptive byproduct of recent positive selection and adaptive evolution in human beings. However, inconsistent results have been also proposed, challenging the recent positive selection theory to explain the high population frequency of schizophrenia-associated alleles. Here, we used public domain data to locate signatures of positive selection based on genetic diversity, derived allele frequency, differentiation between populations, and long haplotypes at schizophrenia-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and randomly selected SNPs (as negative controls). We found evidence for positive selection at 10 out of the 105 schizophrenia-associated SNPs, while 5 of these SNPs involved positive selection for the protective allele. Taken together, the absence of widespread positive selection signals at the schizophrenia-associated SNPs, along with the fact that half of the positive selection favored the protective allele, provide little evidence supporting the positive selection theory in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbz048

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, Y., Yang, J., Xie, Y., Liao, H., Yang, B., Xu, Q., & Rao, S.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Rao, Shuquan
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
603-611
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2947992475
Cited by
10
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2019YFH0137)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2682018CX38)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
schizophrenia, positive selection
MeSH terms
Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Humans, Schizophrenia, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review