The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religiosity and Deviance: Toward a Contingency Theory of Constraining Effects
Abstract
Perspectives on the relationship between individual religiosity and deviance are examined and contextual properties thought to condition the relationship are identified. Hypothesized linkages between these contextual variables and the strength of relationship between religiosity and nine types of deviant behavior are tested. Results indicate the religiosity—deviance relationship varies predictably across sociodemographic contexts, but not always in directions suggested by extant theories. Individual religiosity appears to constrain deviant behavior most effectively in environments characterized by general normative ambiguity, low social integration, generalized perceptions of low peer conformity, and a relatively high proportion of religious nonaffiliates. An integrated interpretation of these counterintuitive findings suggests religious participation can operate as a unique deviance inhibitor only when conformity inducing mechanisms characteristic of religious communities are not reproduced in the larger community. Hence the impact of religious constraints is increased where secular controls are absent or weak.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Merton, R. K. (2017) · Gangs · doi:10.4324/9781351157803-1 · Cited by 3,694
Cited by
Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective
Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134370 · Cited by 954
Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions
Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2787148 · Cited by 760
“If You Love Me, Keep My Commandments”: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Religion on Crime
BAIER, C. J., & WRIGHT, B. R. E. (2001) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427801038001001 · Cited by 572
The importance of faith: Tax morale and religiosity
Torgler, B. (2006) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.007 · Cited by 506
Religion as Context: Hellfire and Delinquency One More Time
Stark, R. (1996) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.2307/3711948 · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Tittle, C. R., & Welch, M. R.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1983-03-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-653
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060062342
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.