The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?
Abstract
The struggle for democracy, central to Western politics for hundreds of years, is predicated upon the belief that democratic institutions give citizens considerable power over their government. Whether this belief is correct is a key question in the study of democratic politics. This article argues that this question is neglected by sociologists who examine the determinants of public policy; they neither address theories of democratic responsiveness nor assess the impact of public opinion on public policy. This neglect is problematic for two reasons: there is much evidence that public opinion strongly influences public policy, and there is reason to believe that adding public opinion to sociologists' empirical analyses of policy change would undermine some of their conclusions about the influence of other factors. Two ways of responding to these findings are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,594
Agendas and instability in American politics
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0574 · Cited by 5,981
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nonetti, R. Y. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7 · Cited by 5,580
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,169
Mills, C. W. (1956) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,631
Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy
Hibbs, D. A. (1977) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400269712 · Cited by 3,368
Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew
Page, B. I. (1975) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148248 · Cited by 3,130
Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. R. (1985) · Cited by 2,628
Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America
Aldrich, J. H. (1995) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,372
A Preface to Democratic Theory.
Gross, F., & Dahl, R. A. (1957) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088784 · Cited by 2,180
Cited by
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda
Burstein, P. (2003) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290305600103 · Cited by 1,438
Self-citationvan Oorschot, W. (2006) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928706059829 · Cited by 1,327
Pescosolido, B. A., Martin, J. K., Long, J. S., Medina, T. R., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121743 · Cited by 1,262
Qazi, A., Hussain, F., Rahim, N. A., Hardaker, G., Alghazzawi, D., Shaban, K., & Haruna, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2906402 · Cited by 1,153
Metadata
- Authors
- Burstein, P.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-27
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164901722
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 37.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/77.1.27
- The paper
- Burstein, P. (1998). Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy? Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.1.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
