The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?
Open accessAbstract
“Is Anyone Doing the Housework?” (Bianchi et al. 2000) was motivated, like much of the research on housework, by a desire to better understand gender inequality and social change in the work and family arena in the United States. During the 1990s, Arlie Hochschild's (1989) influential book, The Second Shift, provided the dominant assessment of the gender division of labor in the home (Konigsberg 2011): men were unwilling to share the burden of work in the home and thus employed women came home to a “second shift” of housework and childcare, increasing gender inequality. Her rich qualitative study was based on a small sample of unknown generalizability, however (Milkie, Raley, & Bianchi 2009). The collection and release of the large and nationally representative 1987-88 National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH) unleashed a flurry of housework articles in the quantitative sociological literature. The NSFH had the advantage of reports of housework from both members of a couple and husbands' and wives' assessments of fairness in the household division of labor, but these data could not provide the trend analysis critical to the understanding of social change that time diary data collections allowed. “Is Anyone Doing the Housework?” used the NSFH but also presented analysis of the only nationally representative data available – time diaries – with which to assess trends in housework and broaden the discussion of how women and men might be reallocating time in the home during a period of rapid change in women's work outside the home. The citation count in Google Scholar stands at 910 citations (as of April 20, 2012), with those citations continuing to the present.1 In the article, we showed that the gender division of labor in housework became more equal over this period, in part because men increased their time in housework but more importantly because women dramatically decreased the time they spent in these activities. Men increased their propensity to do housework and the increase was not a result of change in population composition, whereas for women it was a mix of decreased likelihood of doing housework but also an increase in the proportion of women least likely to spend time in housework (e.g., employed women). We compared time diary data to the NSFH, demonstrating that the NSFH survey questions resulted in estimates that were about 50 percent higher than time diary estimates but that both data sources yielded similar conclusions about the gender gap in housework. Finally, using the NSFH data, we provided a multivariate description of the correlates of wives' housework time, husbands' housework time and the gender gap in housework time of married couples. The findings remain relevant today, save the need for the update of trends provided here. Using time diary data for 1965, 1975, 1985 and 1995, our observation window on housework was one in which the pressure on women to “shed load” to accommodate increased market work was high and in which the pressure on men to “pick up some of the slack” was perhaps also high. Our data analysis spanned the 1970-90 period of greatest labor force increases for U.S. women, particularly married women with young children. Subsequent trend analyses of women's labor force participation, housework and childcare in the 1990s showed much less increase and a leveling off in rates by the end of the 20th century (Sayer 2005; Sayer, Bianchi, & Robinson 2004), causing some to argue that the gender revolution was over (Cotter, Hermsen, & Vanneman 2011). Table 1 updates trends in men's and women's weekly hours of housework through 2010, the most recent data we have available at this writing. Panel A and B show estimates for the two universes we used in the original article: all individuals, aged 25 to 64 years and the subset of married individuals in these age ranges. Table 1 also adds a universe that was not the focus of our 2000 article – Panel C on married parents. This group became a major focus of our subsequent work. Trends in Average Weekly Housework Hours by Gender for Individuals Aged 25 to 64 Source: Authors' calculations, historical USA time diary sample (1965-1999) and American Time Use Survey 2003-2010. Trends in Average Weekly Housework Hours by Gender for Individuals Aged 25 to 64 Source: Authors' calculations, historical USA time diary sample (1965-1999) and American Time Use Survey 2003-2010. Women's time in housework declined throughout the 1965-2010 period, with the most sizable declines between 1965 and 1985. Men's housework time more than doubled between 1965 and 1998/9, when it reached a high of 11 hours per week, and then dropped to 10 hours a week by 2009/10.2 In 2009/10, women are estimated to do 1.6 times the amount of housework as men, on average (with wives averaging 1.7 times the housework of husbands, and married mothers averaging 1.9 times the housework of married fathers). Changes are concentrated in core housework; women's time in other housew
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled
England, P. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210361475 · Cited by 1,687
When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care
Raley, S., Bianchi, S. M., & Wang, W. (2012) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/663354 · Cited by 477
Self-citation
Cited by
Stress and parenting during the global COVID-19 pandemic
Brown, S. M., Doom, J. R., Lechuga-Peña, S., Watamura, S. E., & Koppels, T. (2020) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104699 · Cited by 1,344
Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network
Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., Oakes, J. M., Fan, W., Okechukwu, C., Davis, K. D., Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., King, R. B., Hanson, G. C., et al. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414531435 · Cited by 508
Overwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages
Cha, Y., & Weeden, K. A. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414528936 · Cited by 499
The Production of Inequality: The Gender Division of Labor Across the Transition to Parenthood
Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe‐Sullivan, S. J. (2015) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12189 · Cited by 490
Divorce, Repartnering, and Stepfamilies: A Decade in Review
Raley, R. K., & Sweeney, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12651 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-13
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2054019280
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 56.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/sos120
- The paper
- Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter? Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.