Cited by 120Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

Predictors of objective sleep tendency in the general population

Punjabi, Naresh M., Bandeen-Roche, Karen, Young, Terry·2003·Sleep

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Daytime sleepiness is a pervasive problem that is associated with a significant public-health burden. Although self-reported measures of daytime sleepiness may be useful in identifying at-risk individuals, there is significant controversy because there are no population-based data relating subjective and objective measures of daytime sleep tendency. The aims of this study were to examine the associations between the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), an objective measure of daytime sleep tendency, and self-reported information on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and nighttime sleep duration in the general population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based sample of 261 women and 371 men, mean age of 50.8 years, enrolled in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study. MEASUREMENTS: MSLT, ESS, and self-reported sleep duration prior to the MSLT. RESULTS: Using survival analysis to model the time to sleep onset during the MSLT, we found that individuals with an intermediate (6-11) and high (> or = 12) ESS score had a 30% and 69% increase in risk for sleep onset during the MSLT, respectively, compared to individuals with a low ESS score (< or = 5). A dose-response relationship between self-reported duration of nighttime sleep and objective sleep tendency was also observed. Compared to individuals reporting more than 7.50 hours of sleep (highest tertile), individuals reporting 6.75 to 7.50 hours and less than 6.75 hours (lowest tertile) had a 27% and 73% increase in risk for sleep onset during the MSLT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective reports of daytime sleep tendency on the ESS and the duration of nighttime sleep are associated with the results of the MSLT in the general population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/26.6.678

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lyznicki JM, Doege TC, Davis RM, Williams MA. Sleepiness, driving, and motor vehi- cle crashes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 1998;279:1908-13.
  2. Thorpy MJ, Westbrook P, Ferber R, et al. The clinical use of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association. Sleep 1992;15:268-76.
  3. Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariance test procedures. J R Stat Assoc (Series A) 1972;135:185-206.
  4. Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categor- ical analysis. Epidemiology 1995;6:356-65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Punjabi, N. M., Bandeen-Roche, K., & Young, T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Punjabi, Naresh M.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
678-683
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2396643199
Cited by
120
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23hl004065-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG14124, R01AG014124)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL062252, HL62252, K23 HL 04065)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
daytime sleepiness, multiple sleep latency test, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, nighttime sleep duration, sleep latency, Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study, general population
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Probability, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review