Cited by 630Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Sustained Efficacy of Eszopiclone Over 6 Months of Nightly Treatment: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Adults with Chronic Insomnia

Krystal, Andrew D., Walsh, James K., Laska, Eugene, Caron, Judy, Amato, David A., Wessel, Thomas C., Roth, Thomas·2003·Sleep

Abstract

Study objectives To determine the long-term efficacy of eszopiclone in patients with chronic insomnia. Design Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled. Setting Out-patient, with monthly visits. Patients Aged 21 to 69 years meeting DSM IV criteria for primary insomnia and reporting less than 6.5 hours of sleep per night, and/or a sleep latency of more than 30 minutes each night for at least 1 month before screening. Interventions Eszopiclone 3 mg (n = 593) or placebo (n = 195), nightly for 6 months Measurements and results Efficacy was evaluated weekly using an interactive voice-response system. Endpoints included sleep latency; total sleep time; number of awakenings; wake time after sleep onset; quality of sleep; and next-day ratings of ability to function, daytime alertness, and sense of physical well-being. At the first week and each month for the study duration, eszopiclone produced significant and sustained improvements in sleep latency, wake time after sleep onset, number of awakenings, number of nights awakened per week, total sleep time, and quality of sleep compared with placebo (P Conclusions Throughout 6 months, eszopiclone improved all of the components of insomnia as defined by DSM-IV, including patient ratings of daytime function. This placebo-controlled study of eszopiclone provides compelling evidence that long-term pharmacologic treatment of insomnia is efficacious.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/26.7.793

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In clinical practice, hypnotic medications are often used over durations of one to twelve months without dosage escalation.

    “In clinical practice, hypnotic medications are often used over durations of one to twelve months without dosage escalation, 52-55”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krystal, A. D., Walsh, J. K., Laska, E., Caron, J., Amato, D. A., Wessel, T. C., & Roth, T.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Sunovion (United States) (US)
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Krystal, Andrew D.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2003-10
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
793-799
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2099661804
Cited by
630
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 165 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 29
FWCI
38.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
eszopiclone, chronic insomnia, long-term efficacy, hypnotics, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep quality, daytime functioning, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Circadian Rhythm, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Azabicyclo Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review