Cited by 95Sleep and related disordersSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Patient characteristics and predictors of sleep medication use

Omvik, Siri, Pallesen, Ståle, Bjorvatn, Bjørn, Sivertsen, Børge, Havik, Odd E., Nordhus, Inger H.·2010·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics of sleep medication users, and their satisfaction with treatment and subjective difficulty with quitting the drugs. A representative sample of 5000 adults in Norway was selected to participate in an epidemiologic study. The data were collected through a postal survey in which a total of 2645 (52.9%) participants responded. Weighted logistic regression was used to explore predictors for the drug pattern use. The prevalence of lifetime, current, and chronic use of sleep medications were 18.8, 7.9, and 4.2%. The use was associated with low socioeconomic status, older age, female sex, and frequent symptoms of sleep disorders, anxiety, and depression. Older age and low perceived control over sleep were the strongest predictors for use and difficulty in quitting sleep medications. Among responders who had ever used sleep medications, 80.3% would prefer a nonpharmacological treatment alternative. It is concluded that consumption of sleep medications is widespread in Norway, and that perception of control over sleep may play a significant role in the drug pattern use. Nonpharmacological treatment is to a small extent implemented in the health care sector.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yic.0b013e328334e5e6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omvik, S., Pallesen, S., Bjorvatn, B., Sivertsen, B., Havik, O. E., & Nordhus, I. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Omvik, Siri
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2010-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
91-100
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044890527
Cited by
95
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
sleep medication use, hypnotics, predictors of drug use, treatment satisfaction, sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, socioeconomic status, old age, sex differences, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Drug Utilization, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review