The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Toward Defining the Course of Evolution: Minimum Change for a Specific Tree Topology
Fitch, W. M. (1971) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/20.4.406 · Cited by 6,492
A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships
Sokal, R. R., & Michener, C. D. (1958) · Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16435756 · Cited by 4,416
Fitch, W. M., & Margoliash, E. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.155.3760.279 · Cited by 3,610
A Simple Method for Estimating and Testing Minimum-Evolution Trees
(1992) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040771 · Cited by 1,482
Random number generators: good ones are hard to find
Park, S. K., & Miller, K. W. (1988) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/63039.63042 · Cited by 1,262
(1993) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040082 · Cited by 1,036
Partitioning and Combining Data in Phylogenetic Analysis
Bull, J. J., Huelsenbeck, J. P., Cunningham, C. W., Swofford, D. L., & Waddell, P. J. (1993) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.3.384 · Cited by 902
Self-citation
Cited by
Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D., & Philippe, H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04336 · Cited by 1,651
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162
Phylogeny Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Using Maximum Likelihood
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Crandall, K. A. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.437 · Cited by 1,018
Self-citationPhylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Rannala, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.227 · Cited by 781
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huelsenbeck, J. P.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990263013
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sysbio/44.1.17
- The paper
- Huelsenbeck, J. P. (1995). Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/44.1.17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
