The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Total Global Species Richness Using Rates of Species Description and Estimates of Taxonomic Effort
Open accessAbstract
We found that trends in the rate of description of 580,000 marine and terrestrial species, in the taxonomically authoritative World Register of Marine Species and Catalogue of Life databases, were similar until the 1950s. Since then, the relative number of marine to terrestrial species described per year has increased, reflecting the less explored nature of the oceans. From the mid-19th century, the cumulative number of species described has been linear, with the highest number of species described in the decade of 1900, and fewer species described and fewer authors active during the World Wars. There were more authors describing species since the 1960s, indicating greater taxonomic effort. There were fewer species described per author since the 1920s, suggesting it has become more difficult to discover new species. There was no evidence of any change in individual effort by taxonomists. Using a nonhomogeneous renewal process model we predicted that 24-31% to 21-29% more marine and terrestrial species remain to be discovered, respectively. We discuss why we consider that marine species comprise only 16% of all species on Earth although the oceans contain a greater phylogenetic diversity than occurs on land. We predict that there may be 1.8-2.0 million species on Earth, of which about 0.3 million are marine, significantly less than some previous estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock.
Martin, A. P., & Palumbi, S. R. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.9.4087 · Cited by 1,239 · cited 1×
“…by guest on 30 July 2018 SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY across a range of taxa indicates species richness is higher in warmer climates due to higher metabolism and mutation rates generating higher rates of speciation (e.g., Martin and Palumbi 1993; Wright et al. 2006, 2011).”
BackgroundHow many named species are valid?
Alroy, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.062691099 · Cited by 155
Costello, M., Bouchet, P., Emblow, C., & Legakis, A. (2006) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps316257 · Cited by 78
Self-citationEcological science and tomorrow’s world
May, R. M. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0164 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity
Hortal, J., de Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M., & Ladle, R. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 · Cited by 1,743
How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?
Stork, N. E. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 · Cited by 1,537
Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life
Hinchliff, C. E., Smith, S. A., Allman, J. F., Burleigh, J. G., Chaudhary, R., Coghill, L. M., Crandall, K. A., Deng, J., Drew, B. T., Gazis, R., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423041112 · Cited by 788
Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050
Seebens, H., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Capinha, C., Dawson, W., Dullinger, S., Genovesi, P., Hulme, P. E., van Kleunen, M., Kühn, I., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15333 · Cited by 722
Marine Biodiversity, Biogeography, Deep-Sea Gradients, and Conservation
Costello, M. J., & Chaudhary, C. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.060 · Cited by 429
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Costello, M. J., Wilson, S., & Houlding, B.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 871
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2117740293
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Total Global Species Richness Using Rates of Species Description and Estimates of Taxonomic Effort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sysbio/syr080
- The paper
- Costello, M. J., Wilson, S., & Houlding, B. (2012). Predicting Total Global Species Richness Using Rates of Species Description and Estimates of Taxonomic Effort. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.