The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chitinolytic Enzymes Produced by Trichoderma harzianum: Antifungal Activity of Purified Endochitinase and Chitobiosidase
Abstract
Two chitinolytic enzymes from Trichoderma harzianum strain P1 were tested for their antifungal activity in bioassays against nine different fungal species. Spore germination (or cell replication) and germ tube elongation were inhibited for all chitin-containing fungi except T. harzianum strain P1. The degree of inhibition was proportional to the level of chitin in the cell wall of the target fungi. For most of the fungi tested, the ED50 values for the endochitinase and the chitobiosidase were 35-135 micrograms ml-1 and 62-180 micrograms ml-1, respectively. Complete inhibition occurred at 200-300 micrograms ml-1. Combining the two enzymes resulted in a synergistic increase of antifungal activity. The ED50 values for a 1:1 mixture of endochitinase and chitobiosidase were as low as 10 micrograms ml-1 for Botrytis cinerea, 34 micrograms ml-1 for Ustilago avenae, 13 micrograms ml-1 for Uncinula necator, and 30 micrograms ml-1 for Fusarium solani. T. harzianum strain P1 was resistant to its own chitinolytic enzymes up to 800 micrograms ml-1, with an ED50 value 1,000 micrograms ml-1. The chitinolytic enzymes from T. harzianum appeared to be biologically more active than enzymes from other sources and more effective against a wider range of fungi. The involvement of these chitinolytic enzymes in biocontrol is also discussed
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sharma, R. R., Singh, D., & Singh, R. (2009) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001 · Cited by 1,015
Biotechnological aspects of chitinolytic enzymes: a review
Dahiya, N., Tewari, R., & Hoondal, G. S. (2006) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-005-0183-7 · Cited by 544
Chernin, L. S., Winson, M. K., Thompson, J. M., Haran, S., Bycroft, B. W., Chet, I., Williams, P., & Stewart, G. S. A. B. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.17.4435-4441.1998 · Cited by 238
Castoria, R., De Curtis, F., Lima, G., Caputo, L., Pacifico, S., & De Cicco, V. (2001) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0925-5214(00)00186-1 · Cited by 238
Chitinases: in agriculture and human healthcare
Nagpure, A., Choudhary, B., & Gupta, R. K. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.790874 · Cited by 145
Castoria, R., De Curtis, F., Lima, G., & De Cicco, V. (1997) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0925-5214(97)00061-6 · Cited by 121
Zhang, D., Spadaro, D., Valente, S., Garibaldi, A., & Gullino, M. L. (2012) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.016 · Cited by 87
Shih, I.-L., Kuo, C.-Y., Hsieh, F.-C., Kao, S.-S., & Hsieh, C. (2008) · Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jcice.2008.05.005 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorito, M.
- Venue
- Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 302
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996134016
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.