The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of Triazole-Based Fungicides for Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol Control in Wheat: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis
Abstract
The effects of propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole (as a tank mix or a formulated premix) on the control of Fusarium head blight index (IND; field or plot-level disease severity) and deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat were determined. A multivariate random-effects meta-analytical model was fitted to the log-transformed treatment means from over 100 uniform fungicide studies across 11 years and 14 states, and the mean log ratio (relative to the untreated check or tebuconazole mean) was determined as the overall effect size for quantifying fungicide efficacy. Mean log ratios were then transformed to estimate mean percent reduction in IND and DON relative to the untreated check (percent control: [Formula: see text]IND and [Formula: see text]DON) and relative to tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant reduction in IND and DON (P < 0.001), although there was substantial between-study variability. Prothioconazole+tebuconazole was the most effective fungicide for IND, with a [Formula: see text]IND of 52%, followed by metconazole (50%), prothioconazole (48%), tebuconazole (40%), and propiconazole (32%). For DON, metconazole was the most effective treatment, with a [Formula: see text]DON of 45%; prothioconazole+tebuconazole and prothioconazole showed similar efficacy, with [Formula: see text]DON values of 42 and 43%, respectively; tebuconazole and propiconazole were the least effective, with [Formula: see text]DON values of 23 and 12%, respectively. All fungicides, with the exception of propiconazole, were significantly more effective than tebuconazole for control of both IND and DON (P < 0.001). Relative to tebuconazole, prothioconazole, metconazole, and tebuconzole+prothioconzole reduced disease index a further 14 to 20% and DON a further 25 to 29%. In general, fungicide efficacy was significantly higher for spring wheat than for soft winter wheat studies; depending on the fungicide, the difference in percent control between spring and soft winter wheat was 5 to 20% for [Formula: see text]IND and 7 to 16% for [Formula: see text]DON. Based on the mean log ratios and between-study variances, the probability that IND or DON in a treated plot from a randomly selected study was lower than that in the check by a fixed margin was determined, which confirmed the superior efficacy of prothioconazole, metconazole, and tebuconzole+prothioconzole for Fusarium head blight disease and toxin control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Schabenberger, O. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,924
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons
Lu, G., & Ades, A. E. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1875 · Cited by 2,166
Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression
van Houwelingen, H. C., Arends, L. R., & Stijnen, T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1040 · Cited by 1,580
GROWTH STAGES IN CEREALS ILLUSTRATION OF THE FEEKES SCALE
Large, E. C. (1954) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1954.tb00716.x · Cited by 1,454
Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials
Whitehead, A. (2002) · doi:10.1002/0470854200 · Cited by 827
Meta-analysis: Combining the Results of Independent Experiments
Gurevitch, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2001) · Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195131871.003.0018 · Cited by 703
Cited by
Fusarium graminearum Trichothecene Mycotoxins: Biosynthesis, Regulation, and Management
Chen, Y., Kistler, H. C., & Ma, Z. (2019) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100318 · Cited by 469
Ferrigo, D., Raiola, A., & Causin, R. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21050627 · Cited by 355
Jard, G., Liboz, T., Mathieu, F., Guyonvarc’h, A., & Lebrihi, A. (2011) · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · doi:10.1080/19440049.2011.595377 · Cited by 324
Zalila-Kolsi, I., Kessentini, S., Tounsi, S., & Jamoussi, K. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10040830 · Cited by 24
“, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole [3,4]) and benzimidazole obstruct sterol biosynthesis and are the most effective to suppress FHB symptoms and decrease mycotoxin concentration [5–7].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, P. A., Lipps, P. E., Hershman, D. E., McMullen, M. P., Draper, M. A., & Madden, L. V.
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 999-1011
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7684
- OpenAlex
- W2069803289
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Triazole-Based Fungicides for Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol Control in Wheat: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/phyto-98-9-0999
- The paper
- Paul, P. A., Lipps, P. E., Hershman, D. E., McMullen, M. P., Draper, M. A., & Madden, L. V. (2008). Efficacy of Triazole-Based Fungicides for Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol Control in Wheat: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis. Phytopathology®. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-98-9-0999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.