Cited by 79Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Expression of an Antifungal Peptide in Saccharomyces: A New Approach for Biological Control of the Postharvest Disease Caused by Colletotrichum coccodes

Jones, Richard W., Prusky, Dov·2002·Phytopathology®

Abstract

A cecropin A-based peptide inhibited germination of Colletotrichum coccodes at 50 μM. The DNA sequence encoding the peptide was cloned in pRS413, using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae invertase leader sequence for secretion of the peptide, and expressed in yeast. Yeast transformants inhibited the growth of germinated C. coccodes spores and inhibited decay development caused by C. coccodes in tomato fruits. Expression of the antifungal peptide in yeast therefore represents a new approach for the biological control of postharvest diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto.2002.92.1.33

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probably the first biocontrol engineering example among yeasts is a S. cerevisiae strain expressing the antifungal peptide cecropin A, which resulted in complete inhibition of Colletotrichum coccodes growth on tomatoes.

    “Probably the first “biocontrol engineering example” among yeasts is a S. cerevisiae strain expressing the antifungal peptide cecropin A, which resulted in complete inhibition of Colletotrichum coccodes growth on tomatoes (Jones and Prusky 2002).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Jones and Prusky 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ben-Arie, R., Droby, S., Zutkhi, J., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Sarig, P., Zeidman, M., Daus, A., and Chalutz, E. 1991. Preharvest and postharvest biocontrol of Rhizopus rot of table grapes with yeasts. Pages 100-113 in: Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. Proc. Int. Workshop, Shepardstown, WV. USDA-ARS Pub. 92.
  2. Droby S., 1991, Postharvest News Inf., 2, 169
  3. Elble R., 1992, BioTechniques, 13, 18
  4. Janisiewicz, W. J. 1991. Biological control of postharvest diseases. Pages 301-326 in: Handbook of Applied Mycology: Soils and Plants. Vol. 1. D. K. Arora, B. Rai, K. G. Mukerji, and K. L. Knudsen, eds. Dekker, New York.
  5. Jeffries P., 1990, Postharvest News Inf., 1, 365
  6. Jones R. W., 2000, J. Potato Res., 77, 404
  7. Tu J. C., 1985, Microbiosis, 44, 87

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, R. W., & Prusky, D.
Corresponding author
Prusky, Dov
Venue
Phytopathology®
Published
2002-01
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
33-37
ISSN
  • 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7684
OpenAlex
W2125903374
Cited by
79
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
antifungal peptides, cecropin A, Colletotrichum coccodes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, postharvest disease, biological control, spore germination inhibition, heterologous expression, fungal growth inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review