The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restoration of Fertility by Germ Cell Transplantation Requires Effective Recipient Preparation1
Abstract
Spermatogonial transplantation provides access to the mammalian germline and has been used in experimental animal models to study stem cell/niche biology and germline development, to restore fertility, and to produce transgenic models. The potential to manipulate and/or transplant the germline has numerous practical applications that transcend species boundaries. To make the transplantation technology more broadly accessible, it is necessary to develop practical recipient preparation protocols. In the current study, mouse recipients for spermatogonial transplantation were prepared by treating pregnant females with the chemotherapeutic agent busulfan at different times during gestation. Donor germ cells were introduced into the testes of male progeny between 5 and 12 days postpartum. Analysis of recipient animals revealed that busulfan treatment of pregnant females on 12.5 days postcoitum was the most effective; male progeny transplanted with donor germ cells became fertile and passed the donor genotype to 25% of progeny. This approach was effective because 1) the cytoablative treatment reduced (but did not abolish) endogenous spermatogenesis, creating space for colonization by donor stem cells, 2) residual endogenous germ cells contributed to a healthy testicular environment that supported robust donor and recipient spermatogenesis, and 3) fetal busulfan-treated males could be transplanted as pups, which have been established as better recipients than adults. Laboratory mice provide a valuable experimental model for developing the technology that now can be applied and evaluated in other species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The dominant-white spotting (W) locus of the mouse encodes the c-kit proto-oncogene
Geissler, E. N., Ryan, M. A., & Housman, D. E. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90020-7 · Cited by 1,287
Cited by
Oocyte formation by mitotically active germ cells purified from ovaries of reproductive-age women
White, Y. A. R., Woods, D. C., Takai, Y., Ishihara, O., Seki, H., & Tilly, J. L. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2669 · Cited by 719
In vitro production of fertile sperm from murine spermatogonial stem cell lines
Sato, T., Katagiri, K., Yokonishi, T., Kubota, Y., Inoue, K., Ogonuki, N., Matoba, S., Ogura, A., & Ogawa, T. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1478 · Cited by 228
Wang, X., Ding, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Ma, L., & Xie, X. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.049 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Brinster, C. J., Ryu, B.-Y., Avarbock, M. R., Karagenc, L., Brinster, R. L., & Orwig, K. E.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 412-420
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2097536533
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoration of Fertility by Germ Cell Transplantation Requires Effective Recipient Preparation1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod.103.016519
- The paper
- Brinster, C. J., Ryu, B.-Y., Avarbock, M. R., Karagenc, L., Brinster, R. L., & Orwig, K. E. (2003). Restoration of Fertility by Germ Cell Transplantation Requires Effective Recipient Preparation1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.016519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.