The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transient DNA Strand Breaks During Mouse and Human Spermiogenesis:New Insights in Stage Specificity and Link to Chromatin Remodeling1
Abstract
In the course of mammalian spermiogenesis, a unique chromatin remodeling process takes place within elongating and condensing spermatid nuclei. The histone-to-protamine exchange results in efficient packaging and increased stability of the paternal genome. Although not fully understood, this change in chromatin architecture must require a global but transient appearance of endogenous DNA strand breaks because most of the DNA supercoiling is eliminated in the mature sperm. To establish the extent of DNA strand breakage and the stage specificity at which these breaks are created and repaired, we performed a sensitive terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay to detect in situ DNA strand breaks on both mice and human testis cross sections. In the mouse, we established that DNA strand breaks are indeed detected in the whole population of elongating spermatids between stages IX and XI of the seminiferous epithelium cycle perfectly coincident with the chromatin remodeling as revealed by histone H4 hyperacetylation. Similarly, TUNEL analyses performed on human testis sections revealed an elevated and global increase in the levels of DNA strand breaks present in nuclei of round-shaped spermatids also coincident with chromatin remodeling. The demonstration of the global character of the transient DNA strand breaks in mammalian spermiogenesis suggests that deleterious consequences on genetic integrity of the male gamete may arise from any disturbance in the process. In addition, this investigation may shed some light on the origin of the low success rate that has been encountered so far with intracytoplasmic injection procedures making use of round spermatids in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVENSON, D. P., LARSON, K. L., & JOST, L. K. (2002) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x · Cited by 1,072 · cited 1×
“Not surprisingly, the predictive value of sperm chromatin integrity for pregnancy outcome has been demonstrated and emerges as a new sperm parameter in the clinical setting [6, 7].”
Background
Cited by
Protamines and male infertility
Oliva, R. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml009 · Cited by 802
Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis
Sakkas, D., & Alvarez, J. G. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.046 · Cited by 782
On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa
Aitken, R. J., & De Iuliis, G. N. (2010) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gap059 · Cited by 606
Sharma, R., Agarwal, A., Rohra, V. K., Assidi, M., Abu-Elmagd, M., & Turki, R. F. (2015) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0028-x · Cited by 451
Impact of obesity on male fertility, sperm function and molecular composition
Palmer, N. O., Bakos, H. W., Fullston, T., & Lane, M. (2012) · Spermatogenesis · doi:10.4161/spmg.21362 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcon, L., & Boissonneault, G.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 910-918
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2132809301
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transient DNA Strand Breaks During Mouse and Human Spermiogenesis:New Insights in Stage Specificity and Link to Chromatin Remodeling1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541
- The paper
- Marcon, L., & Boissonneault, G. (2004). Transient DNA Strand Breaks During Mouse and Human Spermiogenesis:New Insights in Stage Specificity and Link to Chromatin Remodeling1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.