Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transient DNA Strand Breaks During Mouse and Human Spermiogenesis:New Insights in Stage Specificity and Link to Chromatin Remodeling1

Marcon, Ludovic, Boissonneault, Guylain·2004·Biology of Reproduction

Abstract

In the course of mammalian spermiogenesis, a unique chromatin remodeling process takes place within elongating and condensing spermatid nuclei. The histone-to-protamine exchange results in efficient packaging and increased stability of the paternal genome. Although not fully understood, this change in chromatin architecture must require a global but transient appearance of endogenous DNA strand breaks because most of the DNA supercoiling is eliminated in the mature sperm. To establish the extent of DNA strand breakage and the stage specificity at which these breaks are created and repaired, we performed a sensitive terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay to detect in situ DNA strand breaks on both mice and human testis cross sections. In the mouse, we established that DNA strand breaks are indeed detected in the whole population of elongating spermatids between stages IX and XI of the seminiferous epithelium cycle perfectly coincident with the chromatin remodeling as revealed by histone H4 hyperacetylation. Similarly, TUNEL analyses performed on human testis sections revealed an elevated and global increase in the levels of DNA strand breaks present in nuclei of round-shaped spermatids also coincident with chromatin remodeling. The demonstration of the global character of the transient DNA strand breaks in mammalian spermiogenesis suggests that deleterious consequences on genetic integrity of the male gamete may arise from any disturbance in the process. In addition, this investigation may shed some light on the origin of the low success rate that has been encountered so far with intracytoplasmic injection procedures making use of round spermatids in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Marcon, L., & Boissonneault, G.
Venue
Biology of Reproduction
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
910-918
ISSN
  • 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7268
OpenAlex
W2132809301
Cited by
282
References
1
FWCI
12.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transient DNA Strand Breaks During Mouse and Human Spermiogenesis:New Insights in Stage Specificity and Link to Chromatin Remodeling1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541
The paper
Marcon, L., & Boissonneault, G. (2004). Transient DNA Strand Breaks During Mouse and Human Spermiogenesis:New Insights in Stage Specificity and Link to Chromatin Remodeling1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.