Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Protamination on Fluorochrome Staining and in Situ Nick-Translation of Murine and Human Mature Spermatozoa1

Bianchi, P. G., Manicardi, G. C., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, U., Sakkas, D.·1993·Biology of Reproduction

Abstract

A major event in enhancing sperm chromatin stability is the replacement of the histones by protamines during spermiogenesis. In this study, we present results indicating that chromomycin A3 (CMA3) can be used to show protamine deficiency in sperm chromatin. Fixed chromatin of mature mouse spermatozoa showed high fluorescence after treatment with ethidium bromide (EB), but was completely unstained after treatment with CMA3. The same chromatin was found to be highly resistant to in situ nick-translation. In contrast, a substantial fraction of human spermatozoa were positive for CMA3. The accessibility of CMA3 to the DNA of human sperm was eliminated if the slides were previously treated with protamine in situ. This treatment did not affect the accessibility of EB to the chromatin. Individual human sperm samples revealed a substantial frequency of spermatozoa with endogenous nicks, which was found to be the same as the frequency of spermatozoa responding positively to CMA3 staining. Treatment of preparations with protamines prevented the identification of the endogenous nicks. These data as a whole suggest that CMA3 could represent a useful tool for the detection of protamine deficiency in sperm chromatin. Furthermore, confirmation of experiments relating sensitivity to nick translation and positivity to CMA3 may allow an indirect in situ visualization of nicked and partially denatured DNA, which could correlate with certain forms of male factor infertility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1083

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Bianchi, P. G., Manicardi, G. C., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, U., & Sakkas, D.
Venue
Biology of Reproduction
Published
1993-11-01
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
1083-1088
ISSN
  • 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7268
OpenAlex
W2144975929
Cited by
263
References
10
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Protamination on Fluorochrome Staining and in Situ Nick-Translation of Murine and Human Mature Spermatozoa1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1083
The paper
Bianchi, P. G., Manicardi, G. C., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, U., & Sakkas, D. (1993). Effect of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Protamination on Fluorochrome Staining and in Situ Nick-Translation of Murine and Human Mature Spermatozoa1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.