Determination of plasma and leukocyte ascorbate concentrations in a randomized, double‐blind trial (830.3)
Abstract
Plasma ascorbate reflects recent intake, whereas leukocyte ascorbate more closely reflects cellular stores and total body pool. Objective was to evaluate the bioavailability of ascorbate in plasma and leukocytes from a novel vitamin C formulation. In this double‐blind, cross‐over, males and females between 18‐60 years were randomized to receive one of the following: Placebo (P, 0mg vitamin C), Ascorbic Acid (AA, 1000mg vitamin C) or Ester‐C ® (EC, 1000mg vitamin C + threonate and furanone) as a single dosage. Plasma and leukocyte ascorbate were measured at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours following treatment. An intention‐to‐treat analysis was conducted on thirty six subjects (18 males, 18 females). Plasma ascorbate percent change from Baseline was significantly higher for EC and AA at 2 hours compared to P (EC=135.55±176, AA=126.60±135, P=2.35±33; p<0.001). At 4, 8, and 24 hours the percent change from Baseline was only significantly higher for EC compared to P (all p蠄0.035). The percent change in leukocyte ascorbate was significantly higher from Baseline for EC at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours (all p蠄0.041) and P at 4 and 24 hours (p蠄0.035) but there was no change from Baseline for the AA group. Vitamin C from Ester‐C and Ascorbic Acid has greater plasma bioavailability than Placebo. Compared to Baseline, Ester‐C ® provides a higher percent change in leukocyte ascorbate, which may be due to the presence of threonate and furanone in the formula.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only four studies (31%) reported leukocyte vitamin C concentration, three (in four articles) for Calcium ascorbate EC and one for liposomal-encapsulated vitamin C.
“Only four studies (31%) reported leukocyte vitamin C concentration, three (in four articles) for Calcium ascorbate EC [16,27,30,38] and one for liposomal-encapsulated vitamin C [37].”
From Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Calder, P. C., Kreider, R. B., & McKay, D. L. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17020279 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Dickerson, B., Gonzalez, D. E., Sowinski, R., Xing, D., Leonard, M., Kendra, J., Jenkins, V., Gopalakrishnan, S., Yoo, C., Ko, J., et al. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16193358 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Though significant findings were apparent from the high-dose study, the interventions lacked a true immune challenge.”
Background
- Authors
- Mitmesser, S., Combs, M., & Evans, M.
- Affiliations
- Nutrition Research NBTY, Inc Ronkonkoma NY United States
- KGK Synergize London ON Canada
- ORCID
- Mitmesser, Susan
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- S1
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1961304973
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Keywords
- vitamin C, furanone, bioavailability, plasma ascorbate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review