Cited by 1Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressExercise and Physiological Responses

Comparative Effectiveness of Ascorbic Acid vs. Calcium Ascorbate Ingestion on Pharmacokinetic Profiles and Immune Biomarkers in Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Study

Open access
Dickerson, Broderick, Gonzalez, Drew E., Sowinski, Ryan, Xing, Dante, Leonard, Megan, Kendra, Jacob, Jenkins, Victoria, Gopalakrishnan, Siddharth +8 more·2024·Nutrients

Abstract

Background: Previous trials have displayed augmented intracellular vitamin C concentrations in the leukocytes at 24 h after acute supplementation with 1000 mg calcium ascorbate (CA), compared to ascorbic acid (AA). Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate comparative leukocyte vitamin C accumulation kinetics over 32 h following acute 250 mg or 500 mg doses from the two sources. Secondary objectives were to evaluate neutrophil phagocytic function and lymphocyte differentiation between the two sources of vitamin C. Methods: Ninety-three healthy females (250 mg, n = 27; 500 mg, n = 24) and males (250 mg, n = 19; 500 mg, n = 23) were assigned to ingest a single dose of CA or AA providing 250 mg or 500 mg of vitamin C in two separate double-blind, randomized crossover trials. Results: There were no significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between the two treatments in the 250 mg low-dose study. Conversely, there was evidence that ingestion of 500 mg of CA increased DHA in plasma, increased neutrophil functionality during the first 8 h of the PK study, promoted increased natural killer cells, and altered weight-adjusted PK profiles, suggesting greater volume distribution and clearance from the blood. Conclusions: These findings indicate that 500 mg of CA may promote some immune benefits compared to 500 mg of AA ingestion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu16193358

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmacokinetic analysis showed Calcium ascorbate EC had a greater volume of distribution and clearance from the blood compared to ascorbic acid, especially at 500 mg.

    “Pharmacokinetic analysis showed Calcium ascorbate EC had a greater volume of distribution and clearance from the blood compared to ascorbic acid, especially at a dosage of 500 mg, indicating its more effective utilization by the body.”

    From Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (§4.6, page unavailable) report that at 500 mg, total vitamin C volume of distribution significantly decreased with calcium ascorbate, contrary to the claimed increase. Clearance measures only tended to be higher (p = 0.073 and 0.058), so the results also do not establish greater clearance or more effective utilization. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At 500 mg, Calcium ascorbate EC significantly increased dehydroascorbic acid levels in plasma compared to ascorbic acid.

    “However, at 500 mg, Calcium ascorbate EC significantly increased dehydroascorbic acid levels in plasma, indicating better absorption compared to ascorbic acid, suggesting that calcium ascorbate EC can enhance vitamin C bioavailability at higher doses.”

    From Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (section 4.3) report significantly higher plasma dehydroascorbic acid AUC after 500 mg calcium ascorbate than after ascorbic acid, and the Discussion (section 5.1) reports higher levels at most post-dose time points. However, the Methods (section 2.4) identify the tested material as calcium ascorbate, not a formulation designated “EC,” so that added specificity is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study found no significant differences between Calcium ascorbate EC and ascorbic acid at the 250 mg dose.

    “The study found no significant differences between Calcium ascorbate EC and ascorbic acid at the 250 mg dose.”

    From Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Abstract and Conclusions (no page numbers supplied) report no significant differences in the main outcomes between calcium ascorbate and ascorbic acid at 250 mg. However, Results §4.6 reports a significantly faster total vitamin C half-life with calcium ascorbate in the low-dose study (p = 0.039), so the unqualified claim of no significant differences is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lower infection risk reported with Calcium ascorbate EC is consistent with reported improvements in immune cell function and in leucocyte vitamin C reported in other studies.

    “The lower infection risk reported with Calcium ascorbate EC in [28] is consistent with the reported improvements in immune cell function [30] and in leucocyte vitamin C reported in other studies [16,27].”

    From Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that another study found fewer and less severe cold-like symptoms after 60 days of calcium ascorbate supplementation. This paper’s own crossover studies measured pharmacokinetics and immune biomarkers, not infection risk, so it does not establish a lower infection risk for Calcium ascorbate EC in its participants. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At 500 mg, Calcium ascorbate EC improved neutrophil phagocytosis and increased natural killer cell counts.

    “Also, at 500 mg, Calcium ascorbate EC improved neutrophil phagocytosis and increased natural killer cell counts, suggesting superior immune support over ascorbic acid.”

    From Enhanced Vitamin C Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Alternative Supplement Forms in Healthy Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion (§5.2) reports that 500 mg calcium ascorbate increased neutrophil phagocytosis from baseline and increased CD16+ and CD56+ natural killer cells; the Conclusions (§6) suggest possible immune benefits compared with ascorbic acid. However, the Supplementation Procedure (§2.4) identifies the tested material as calcium ascorbate, not as an “EC” formulation, so that added designation is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Ferguson B. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia, PA, USA 2014

Cited by

Authors
Dickerson, B., Gonzalez, D. E., Sowinski, R., Xing, D., Leonard, M., Kendra, J., Jenkins, V., Gopalakrishnan, S., Yoo, C., Ko, J., Pillai, S. S., Bhamore, J. R., Patil, B. S., Wright, G. A., Rasmussen, C. J., & Kreider, R. B.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Kreider, Richard B.
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-02
Volume
16
Issue
19
Pages
3358
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403064126
Cited by
1
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The Bountiful Co. (Ronkonkoma, NY, USA) (NBTY001)
  • Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab (NBTY001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
vitamin C, calcium ascorbate, pharmacokinetics, immunological markers, lymphocyte differentiation, natural killer cells, docosahexaenoic acid, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Ascorbic Acid, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Neutrophils, Phagocytosis, Biomarkers, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review