Cited by 15RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Cell penetrating peptide‐mediated nuclear delivery of Cas9 to enhance the utility of CRISPR/Cas genome editing

Axford, David S., Morris, Daniel P., McMurry, Jonathan L·2017·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 is a transformative technology that allows genome editing in a variety of eukaryotic cells. However, many cell types and tissues are resistant to transfection or other delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 complex, which has limited its utility. Our novel cell‐penetrating peptide (CPP) adaptor, TAT‐CaM, allows cytoplasmic delivery and release of a wide variety of biomolecular cargos. The integration of CRISPR/Cas9 with CPP‐mediated delivery could make CRISPR/Cas9 much more widely utile. Recombinant Cas9 containing a calmodulin binding site (CBS‐Cas9) was expressed in Escherichia coli, from which it was purified using affinity chromatography on a calmodulin sepharose column. TAT‐CaM/CBS‐Cas9 complexes were assayed for cell penetrating capabilities and subcellular localization using confocal microscopy. Several other CPPs and adaptor proteins, e.g. SAP and CALL3, and model cargos with subcellular localization signals were assayed in an attempt to develop CPP‐adaptor deliveries with altered kinetics and destinations. After cell penetrating capability and subcellular localization were assessed, a nuclear localization sequence was added to the gene encoding Cas9. Enhanced nuclear localization of Cas9 would make it more effective in potentially editing genes. Future work will integrate the present results into an effective CRISPR/Cas9 delivery and gene editing system. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by NIH grant R15GM120691

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.909.4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Axford et al. (2017) demonstrated cellular and sub-cellular localization of CPP-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 RNP using confocal microscopy.

    “Axford et al. (2017) in which the authors demonstrated cellular and sub-cellular localization of CPP-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 RNP using confocal microscopy.”

    From Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches (2018) · cites this paper as Axford et al., 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Axford, D. S., Morris, D. P., & McMurry, J. L.
Affiliations
Kennesaw State University (US)
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04
Volume
31
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2892125362
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R15GM120691)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
cell-penetrating peptides, CRISPR/Cas9, nuclear delivery, calmodulin binding site, Cas9, nuclear localization signal, genome editing, subcellular localization, SAP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review