Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow?

Turner, Charles H., Forwood, Mark R., Otter, Mark W.·1994·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

When compact bone is subjected to bending loads, interstitial fluid in the bone matrix flows away from regions of high compressive stress. The amount of interstitial fluid flow is strongly influenced by the loading rate in a dose‐dependent fashion, We hypothesize that interstitial fluid flow affects bone formation, and we tested this hypothesis indirectly by measuring the effect of different loading frequencies on bone formation rate in vivo. The right tibiae of adult female rats were subjected to applied bending at frequencies of 0.05. 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Hz for a 2‐wk period. The rats were then killed and histomorphometric measurements of bone formation were made of the midshaft of the tibia. Bending of the tibia increased bone formation rate in the higher‐frequency (0.5 to 2.0 Hz) loading groups as much as fourfold, yet no increase in bone formation rate was observed for loading frequencies below 0.5 Hz. In a separate experiment, we found stress‐generated potentials (SGP) in the rat tibia to increase monotonically with increasing loading frequency. The dose‐response relationship between loading frequency and the bone formation response closely resembles the relationship between loading frequency and SGP within bone. The qualitative similarity between these two relationships suggests that increased bone formation is associated with increased SGP, which are caused by interstitial fluid flow. Bone cells are known to be sensitive to electric fields and may respond directly to SGP. Also, fluid shear forces have been shown to stimulate bone cells in culture, so it is possible that increased interstitial fluid flow directly affects bone formation.— Turner, C. H., Forwood, M. R., Otter, M. W. Mechanotransduction∗∗∗ in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? FASEB J. 8: 875‐878; 1994.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.8.11.8070637

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
Turner, C. H., Forwood, M. R., & Otter, M. W.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-08
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
875-878
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1486376581
Cited by
411
References
24
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.8.11.8070637
The paper
Turner, C. H., Forwood, M. R., & Otter, M. W. (1994). Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.8.11.8070637

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.