Cited by 160Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHeat shock proteins researchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

HSP induction mediates selective clearance of tau phosphorylated at proline-directed Ser/Thr sites but not KXGS (MARK) sites

Dickey, Chad A., Dunmore, Judith, Lu, Bingwei, Wang, Ji‐Wu, Lee, Wing C., Kamal, Adeela, Burrows, Francis, Eckman, Christopher +2 more·2006·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are a characteristic neuropathological feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and molecular chaperones appear to be involved in the removal of disease‐associated hyperphosphorylated tau, a primary component of NFTs. Here, novel HSP90 inhibitors were used to examine the impact of chaperone elevation on clearance of different tau species in transfected cells using a unique quantitative assay. The HSP90 inhibitors reduced levels of tau phosphorylated at proline‐directed Ser/Thr sites (pS202/T205, pS396/S404) and conformationally altered (MC‐1) tau species, an epitope that is immeasurable by standard Western blot techniques. The selective clearance of these phospho‐tau species and MC‐1 tau was mediated via the proteasome, while lysosomal‐mediated tau degradation seems to lack specificity for certain tau species, suggesting a more general role in total tau removal. Interestingly, tau phosphorylated at S262/S356 within the tau microtubule binding domain was minimally affected by chaperone induction. Overall, our data show that chaperone induction results in the selective clearance of specific phospho‐tau and conformationally altered tau species mediated by the proteasome; however, the apparent stability of pS262/S356 tau may also explain why MARK is able to regulate normal tau function yet still be linked to the initiation of pathogenic tau hyperphosphorylation in AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.05-5343fje

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickey, C. A., Dunmore, J., Lu, B., Wang, J., Lee, W. C., Kamal, A., Burrows, F., Eckman, C., Hutton, M., & Petrucelli, L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville College of Medicine Jacksonville Florida
  • Conforma Therapeutics Corporation San Diego California
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02-07
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
753-755
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2149746962
Cited by
160
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (PO1 AG17216)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
tau hyperphosphorylation, Hsp90 inhibitors, heat shock proteins, molecular chaperones, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, proteasomal degradation, lysosomal degradation, MARK kinases, protein clearance
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Cells, Cultured, Cricetinae, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Phosphoserine, Phosphothreonine, Proline, tau Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review