Cited by 103Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCalpain Protease Function and RegulationDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Cleavage of Tau by calpain in Alzheimer's disease: the quest for the toxic 17 kD fragment

Garg, Sarika, Timm, Thomas, Mandelkow, Eva-Maria, Mandelkow, Eckhard, Wang, Yipeng·2011·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

The amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) posits that the generation of β-amyloid (Aβ) triggers Tau neurofibrillary pathology. Recently a "17 kD" calpain-induced Tau fragment, comprising residues 45-230 (molecular weight [MW], 18.7 kD), was proposed to mediate Aβ-induced toxicity. Here, we demonstrate that the "17 kD" fragment is actually much smaller, containing residues 125-230 (molecular weight, 10.7 kD). Inducing Tau phosphorylation by okadaic acid or mimicking phosphorylation by Glu mutations at the epitopes of Alzheimer-diagnostic antibodies AT100/AT8/PHF1 could not prevent the generation of this fragment. The fragment can be induced not only by Aβ oligomers, but also by other cell stressors, e.g., thapsigargin (a Ca(2+)-ATPase inhibitor) or glutamate (an excitatory neurotransmitter). However, overexpression of neither Tau(45-230) nor Tau(125-230) fragment is toxic to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, neuroblastoma cells (N2a) or primary hippocampal neurons. Finally, the calpain-induced fragment can be observed both in Alzheimer's disease brains and in control normal human brains. We conclude that the 17 kD Tau fragment is not a mediator of Aβ-induced toxicity, leaving open the possibility that upstream calpain activation might cause both Tau fragmentation and toxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.008

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garg, S., Timm, T., Mandelkow, E.-M., Mandelkow, E., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology (DE)
  • Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Mandelkow, Eckhard
  • Wang, Yipeng
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169388089
Cited by
103
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Calpain Protease Function and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
tau protein, calpain, Alzheimer's disease, tau phosphorylation, amyloid-beta, amyloid hypothesis, neurofibrillary tangles, thapsigargin, glutamate excitotoxicity, tau cleavage, neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Adducins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Calmodulin-Binding Proteins, Calpain, Cell Count, Cerebral Cortex, Cricetulus, Embryo, Mammalian, Enzyme Inhibitors, Cricetinae, Humans, Molecular Weight, Mutation, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Peptides, Phosphorylation, Transfection, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Glutamic Acid, Thapsigargin, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review