Cited by 105Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Alzheimer disease specific phosphoepitopes of Tau interfere with assembly of tubulin but not binding to microtubules

Amniai, Laziza, Barbier, Pascale, Sillen, Alain, Wieruszeski, Jean-Michel, Peyrot, Vincent, Lippens, Guy, Landrieu, Isabelle·2009·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

In Alzheimer disease (AD)-affected neurons, the Tau protein is found in an aggregated and hyperphosphorylated state. A common hypothesis is that Tau hyperphosphorylation causes its dissociation from the microtubular surface, with consequently a breakdown of the microtubules (MTs) and aggregation of the unbound Tau. We evaluated the effect of Tau phosphorylation on both tubulin assembly and MT binding. We show that the cyclin-dependent kinase 2/cyclin A3 kinase complex can generate the AT8 and AT180 AD-specific phospho-epitopes and use NMR spectroscopy to validate qualitatively and quantitatively the phospho content of our samples. The simultaneous presence of both epitopes disables the tubulin assembly capacity of Tau in conditions whereby Tau is the driving force for the assembly process but does not, however, inhibit MT assembly when the latter is driven by an increased tubulin concentration. When compared to the isolated MT binding repeats (K(d)=0.3 microM), the phospho-Tau retains a substantial affinity for preformed MTs (K(d)=11 nM), suggesting that the phosphorylated proline-rich region still participates in the binding event. Our results hence indicate that the sole phosphorylation at the AT8/AT180 epitopes, although leading to a functional defect for Tau, is not sufficient for its dissociation from the MT surface and subsequent aggregation as observed in AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.08-121590

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amniai, L., Barbier, P., Sillen, A., Wieruszeski, J.-M., Peyrot, V., Lippens, G., & Landrieu, I.
Affiliations
  • Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 1 Villeneuve d'Ascq France
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
1146-1152
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1995531595
Cited by
105
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, tau protein, tau hyperphosphorylation, tubulin assembly, microtubule binding, CDK2, proline-rich region, tau aggregation, microtubule stability
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Epitopes, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Microtubules, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Recombinant Proteins, Tubulin, Reproducibility of Results, tau Proteins, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review