The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nuclear factor I‐C reciprocally regulates adipocyte and osteoblast differentiation via control of canonical Wnt signaling
Abstract
Nuclear factor I‐C (NFIC) has recently been identified as an important player in osteogenesis and bone homeostasis in vivo. However, the molecular mechanisms involved have yet to be defined. In the current study, Nfic expression was altered in primary marrow stromal cells and established progenitor lines after adipogenic and osteogenic treatment. Overexpression of Nfic in stromal cells ST2, mesenchymal cells C3H10T1/2, and primary marrow stromal cells inhibited adipogenic differentiation, whereas it promoted osteogenic differentiation. Conversely, silencing of endogenous Nfic in the cell lines enhanced adipogenic differentiation, whereas it blocked osteogenic differentiation. Mechanism investigations revealed that Nfic overexpression promoted nuclear translocation of β‐catenin and increased nuclear protein levels of β‐catenin and transcription factor 7‐like 2 (TCF7L2). Promoter studies and the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay revealed that NFIC directly binds to the promoter of low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 5 (Lrp5) and thereafter transactivates the promoter. Finally, inactivation of canonical Wnt signaling in ST2 attenuated the inhibition of adipogenic differentiation and stimulation of osteogenic differentiation by NFIC. Our study suggests that NFIC balances adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation from progenitor cells through controlling canonical Wnt signaling and highlights the potential of NFIC as a target for new therapies to control metabolic disorders like osteoporosis and obesity.—Zhou, J., Wang, S., Qi, Q., Yang, X., Zhu, E., Yuan, H., Li, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., Wang, B. Nuclear factor I‐C reciprocally regulates adipocyte and osteoblast differentiation via control of canonical Wnt signaling. FASEB J. 31, 1939–1952 (2017). www.fasebj.org
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Canonical Wnt signaling is involved as a major mechanism in the control of osteogenesis and bone mass accrual by many regulators such as BMPs, nuclear factor-I (NFI) family members and microRNAs [31–36].”
From N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 suppresses osteoblast differentiation through inactivating Wnt/β-catenin signaling (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
The transcription factor Nfixis essential for normal brain development
Campbell, C. E., Piper, M., Plachez, C., Yeh, Y.-T., Baizer, J. S., Osinski, J. M., Litwack, E. D., Richards, L. J., & Gronostajski, R. M. (2008) · BMC Developmental Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-213x-8-52 · Cited by 179
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.028 · DOI
- 10.1093/abbs/gmq130 · DOI
- 10.2147/TACG.S51064 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI200419900 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0403652101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2012.01.043 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.8.14.1654 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.211416898 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7652557 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/emboj/16.24.7432 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.011 · DOI
- 10.2741/4214 · DOI
- 10.1002/dvdy.24182 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-12-181 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcb.23421 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.127068 · DOI
- 10.1002/stem.1733 · DOI
- 10.1038/cddis.2013.356 · DOI
- 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/stem.1947 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M313294200 · DOI
- MacDonald B. T., 2012, Frizzled and LRP5/6 receptors for Wnt/β‐catenin signaling, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 4, 10.1101/cshperspect.a007880 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhs307 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.23081 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12035-008-8048-6 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.02293-06 · DOI
- Wong Y. W., 2007, Gene expression analysis of nuclear factor I‐A deficient mice indicates delayed brain maturation, Genome Biol., 8
- 10.1128/MCB.25.2.685-698.2005 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1075-1084.2003 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0029160 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109.009084 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.48 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M501080200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013 · DOI
- 10.1359/jbmr.070810 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-213X-9-26 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M501900200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.01428-09 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm.2448 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1359/jbmr.040907 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00441-009-0832-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11010-015-2329-y · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0144982 · DOI
- 10.1111/jre.12294 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034514525200 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shi, X., Cen, Y., Shan, L., Tian, L., Zhu, E., Yuan, H., Li, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, B. (2022) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-022-02714-5 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, J., Wang, S., Qi, Q., Yang, X., Zhu, E., Yuan, H., Li, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., & Wang, B.
- Affiliations
- Key Laboratory of Hormones and Development Ministry of Health Tianjin Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases Tianjin China
- College of Basic Medical Sciences Tianjin China
- Stomatological Hospital Tianjin Medical University Tianjin China
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-25
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1939-1952
- ISSN
- 0892-6638
- 1530-6860
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-11-19)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672116, 81472040, 81271977, 81101596, 81501846)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review