Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Humanized mice in studying efficacy and mechanisms of PD‐1‐targeted cancer immunotherapy

Open access
Wang, Minan, Yao, Li‐Chin, Cheng, Mingshan, Cai, Danying, Martinek, Jan, Pan, Chong‐Xian, Shi, Wei, Ma, Ai‐Hong, de Vere White, Ralph W., Airhart, Susan, Liu, Edison T., Banchereau, Jacques, Brehm, Michael A., Greiner, Dale L., Shultz, Leonard D., Palucka, Karolina, Keck, James G.·2018·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Establishment of an in vivo small animal model of human tumor and human immune system interaction would enable preclinical investigations into the mechanisms underlying cancer immunotherapy. To this end, nonobese diabetic ( NOD).Cg‐Prkdc scid IL2rg tm1Wjl /Sz (null; NSG) mice were transplanted with human (h)CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells, which leads to the development of human hematopoietic and immune systems [humanized NSG (HuNSG)]. HuNSG mice received human leukocyte antigen partially matched tumor implants from patient‐ derived xenografts [PDX; non ‐ small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sarcoma, bladder cancer, and triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC)] or from a TNBC cell line‐derived xenograft (CDX). Tumor growth curves were similar in HuNSG compared with nonhuman immune‐engrafted NSG mice. Treatment with pembrolizumab, which targets programmed cell death protein 1, produced significant growth inhibition in both CDX and PDX tumors in HuNSG but not in NSG mice. Finally, inhibition of tumor growth was dependent on hCD8 + T cells, as demonstrated by antibody‐mediated depletion. Thus, tumor‐bearing HuNSG mice may represent an important, new model for preclinical immunotherapy research.—Wang, M., Yao, L.‐C., Cheng, M., Cai, D., Martinek, J., Pan, C.‐X., Shi, W., Ma, A.‐H., De Vere White, R. W., Airhart, S., Liu, E. T., Banchereau, J., Brehm, M. A., Greiner, D. L., Shultz, L. D., Palucka, K., Keck, J. G. Humanized mice in studying efficacy and mechanisms of PD‐1‐targeted cancer immunotherapy. FASEB J. 32,1537 ‐1549 (2018). www.fasebj.org

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.201700740r

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Yao, L., Cheng, M., Cai, D., Martinek, J., Pan, C., Shi, W., Ma, A., de Vere White, R. W., Airhart, S., Liu, E. T., Banchereau, J., Brehm, M. A., Greiner, D. L., Shultz, L. D., Palucka, K., & Keck, J. G.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-03
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
1537-1549
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2768987490
Cited by
339
References
52
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Humanized mice in studying efficacy and mechanisms of PD‐1‐targeted cancer immunotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.201700740r
The paper
Wang, M., Yao, L., Cheng, M., Cai, D., Martinek, J., Pan, C., Shi, W., Ma, A., de Vere White, R. W., Airhart, S., Liu, E. T., Banchereau, J., Brehm, M. A., Greiner, D. L., Shultz, L. D., Palucka, K., & Keck, J. G. (2018). Humanized mice in studying efficacy and mechanisms of PD‐1‐targeted cancer immunotherapy. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700740r

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.