The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Surgical Levels of Propofol and Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Subjects Studied with Positron Emission Tomography
Abstract
Background: The authors report a positron emission tomography (PET) study on humans with parallel exploration of the dose-dependent effects of an intravenous (propofol) and a volatile (sevoflurane) anesthetic agent on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using quantitative and relative (Statistical Parametric Mapping [SPM]) analysis. Methods: Using H(2)(15)O, rCBF was assessed in 16 healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] physical status I) volunteers awake and at three escalating drug concentrations: 1, 1.5, and 2 MAC/EC(50), or specifically, at either 2, 3, and 4% end-tidal sevoflurane (n = 8), or 6, 9, and 12 microg/ml plasma concentration of propofol (n = 8). Rocuronium was used for muscle relaxation. Results: Both drugs decreased the bispectral index and blood pressure dose-dependently. Comparison between adjacent levels showed that sevoflurane initially (0 vs. 1 MAC) reduced absolute rCBF by 36-53% in all areas, then (1 vs. 1.5 MAC) increased rCBF in the frontal cortex, thalamus, and cerebellum (7-16%), and finally (1.5 vs. 2 MAC) caused a dual effect with a 23% frontal reduction and a 38% cerebellar increase. In the propofol group, flow was also initially reduced by 62-70%, with minor further effects. In the SPM analysis of the "awake to 1 MAC/EC(50)" step, both anesthetic agents reduced relative rCBF in the cuneus, precuneus, posterior limbic system, and the thalamus or midbrain; additionally, propofol reduced relative rCBF in the parietal and frontal cortices. Conclusions: Both anesthetic agents caused a global reduction of rCBF (propofol > sevoflurane) at the 1 MAC/EC(50) level. The effect was maintained at higher propofol concentrations, whereas 2 MAC sevoflurane caused noticeable flow redistribution. Despite the marked global changes, SPM analysis enabled detailed localization of regions with the greatest relative decreases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The first wave of neuroimaging studies of the anesthetized state employed positron emission tomography and revealed regional patterns of metabolic depression in cortical areas, including frontal-parietal networks [138].”
From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [138]
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
A Primer for EEG Signal Processing in Anesthesia
Rampil, I. J. (1998) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199810000-00023 · Cited by 1,503
PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL DRIVEN INFUSION OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN
Marsh, B., White, M., Morton, N. S., & Kenny, G. N. C. (1991) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/67.1.41 · Cited by 1,168
Accurate Three-Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain
Pelizzari, C. A., Chen, G. T. Y., Spelbring, D. R., Weichselbaum, R. R., & Chen, C.-T. (1989) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-198901000-00004 · Cited by 1,095
Cerebral Metabolism during Propofol Anesthesia in Humans Studied with Positron Emission Tomography
Alkire, M. T., Haier, R. J., Barker, S. J., Shah, N. K., Wu, J. C., & Kao, J. Y. (1995) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199502000-00010 · Cited by 350
A Fully Automatic Multimodality Image Registration Algorithm
Ardekani, B. A., Braun, M., Hutton, B. F., Kanno, I., & Iida, H. (1995) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199507000-00022 · Cited by 310
Alkire, M. T. M., Haier, R. J. P., Shah, N. K. M., & Anderson, C. T. M. (1997) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199703000-00006 · Cited by 235
Alkire, M. T., Pomfrett, C. J. D., Haier, R. J., Gianzero, M. V., Chan, C. M., Jacobsen, B. P., & Fallon, J. H. (1999) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199903000-00011 · Cited by 221
Effect of propofol on cerebral blood flow and metabolism in man
Vandesteene, A., Trempont, V., Engelman, E., Deloof, T., Focroul, M., Schoutens, A., & Rood, M. D. (1988) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09067.x · Cited by 209
Quantitative EEG correlations with brain glucose metabolic rate during anesthesia in volunteers
Alkire, M. T. (1998) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199808000-00007 · Cited by 177
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · Cited by 2,573
Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems
Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.22 · Cited by 1,600
Boveroux, P., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Bruno, M.-A., Noirhomme, Q., Lauwick, S., Luxen, A., Degueldre, C., Plenevaux, A., Schnakers, C., Phillips, C., et al. (2010) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181f697f5 · Cited by 630
Disruption of frontal-parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane
Lee, U., Ku, S., Noh, G., Baek, S., Choi, B., & Mashour, G. A. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31829103f5 · Cited by 426
Brain, conscious experience and the observing self
Baars, B. J., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Laureys, S. (2003) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2003.09.015 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaisti, K. K., Metsähonkala, L., Teräs, M., Oikonen, V., Aalto, S., Jääskeläinen, S., Hinkka, S., & Scheinin, H.
- Affiliations
- Turku University Hospital (FI)
- Child Neurologist; Department of Child Neurology.
- Physicist.
- Modeller.
- Turku PET Centre (FI)
- Statistician, Department of Biostatistics.
- University of Turku (FI)
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1358-1370
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036296234
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Keywords
- propofol, sevoflurane, regional cerebral blood flow, depth of anesthesia, bispectral index, cerebral blood flow redistribution, frontal cortex, cerebellum, thalamus, statistical parametric mapping, healthy volunteers, end-tidal sevoflurane, plasma propofol concentration, 15O-water PET
- MeSH terms
- Sevoflurane, Adult, Blood Pressure, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Methyl Ethers, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Propofol, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Anesthetics, Intravenous
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review