Cited by 235Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchBiomedical and Chemical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positron Emission Tomography Study of Regional Cerebral Metabolism in Humans during Isoflurane Anesthesia

Alkire, Michael T. MD, Haier, Richard J. PhD, Shah, Nitin K. MD, Anderson, Cynthia T. MD·1997·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: Although the anesthetic effects of the intravenous anesthetic agent propofol have been studied in the living human brain using brain imaging technology, the nature of the anesthetic state evident in the human brain during inhalational anesthesia remains unknown. To examine this issue, the authors studied the effects of isoflurane anesthesia on human cerebral glucose metabolism using positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: Five volunteers each underwent two PET scans; one scan assessed awake-baseline metabolism and the other scan assessed metabolism during isoflurane anesthesia titrated to the point of unresponsiveness (means +/- SD; expired = 0.5 +/- 0.1%). Scans were obtained with a GE2048 scanner (4.5-mm resolution-FWHM) using the 18fluorodeoxyglucose technique. Results: Awake whole-brain glucose metabolism averaged 6.9 +/- 1.5 mg.100 g-1.min-1 (means +/- SD). Isoflurane reduced whole-brain metabolism 46 +/- 11% to 3.6 +/- 0.3 mg.100 g-1.min-1 (P < or = 0.005). Regional metabolism decreased fairly uniformly throughout the brain, and no evidence of any regional metabolic increases were found in any brain region for any participant. A region-of-interest analysis showed that the pattern of regional metabolism evident during isoflurane anesthesia was not significantly different from that seen when participants were awake. Conclusion: These data clarify that the anesthetic state evident in the living human brain during unresponsiveness induced with isoflurane is associated with a global, fairly uniform, whole-brain glucose metabolic reduction of 46 +/- 11%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00006

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Alkire, M. T. M., Haier, R. J. P., Shah, N. K. M., & Anderson, C. T. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
549-557
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035252578
Cited by
235
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
isoflurane, inhalational anesthesia, brain glucose metabolism, regional brain metabolism, unresponsiveness, 18F-FDG PET
MeSH terms
Adult, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Brain, Consciousness, Depression, Chemical, Glucose, Humans, Isoflurane, Male, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Anesthetics, Inhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review