Cited by 426Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Disruption of frontal-parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane

Open access
Lee, UnCheol, Ku, SeungWoo, Noh, GyuJeong, Baek, SeungHye, Choi, ByungMoon, Mashour, George A.·2013·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Introduction: Directional connectivity from anterior to posterior brain regions (or “feedback” connectivity) has been shown to be inhibited by propofol and sevoflurane. In this study the authors tested the hypothesis that ketamine would also inhibit cortical feedback connectivity in frontoparietal networks. Methods: Surgical patients (n = 30) were recruited for induction of anesthesia with intravenous ketamine (2 mg/kg); electroencephalography of the frontal and parietal regions was acquired. The authors used normalized symbolic transfer entropy, a computational method based on information theory, to measure directional connectivity across frontal and parietal regions. Statistical analysis of transfer entropy measures was performed with the permutation test and the time-shift test to exclude false-positive connectivity. For comparison, the authors used normalized symbolic transfer entropy to reanalyze electroencephalographic data gathered from surgical patients receiving either propofol (n = 9) or sevoflurane (n = 9) for anesthetic induction. Results: Ketamine reduced alpha power and increased gamma power, in contrast to both propofol and sevoflurane. During administration of ketamine, feedback connectivity gradually diminished and was significantly inhibited after loss of consciousness (mean ± SD of baseline and anesthesia: 0.0074 ± 0.003 and 0.0055 ± 0.0027; F (5, 179) = 7.785, P < 0.0001). By contrast, feedforward connectivity was preserved during exposure to ketamine (mean ± SD of baseline and anesthesia: 0.0041 ± 0.0015 and 0.0046 ± 0.0018; F (5, 179) = 2.07; P = 0.072). Like ketamine, propofol and sevoflurane selectively inhibited feedback connectivity after anesthetic induction. Conclusions: Diverse anesthetics disrupt frontal–parietal communication, despite molecular and neurophysiologic differences. Analysis of directional connectivity in frontal–parietal networks could provide a common metric of general anesthesia and insight into the cognitive neuroscience of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0b013e31829103f5

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several lines of evidence suggest that anesthetics preferentially affect feedback connectivity originating in frontal cortex, as predicted by GNW theory.

    “Several lines of evidence also suggest that anesthetics preferentially affect feedback connectivity originating in the frontal cortex, as might be predicted by the GNW theory (Lee et al., 2013; Moon et al., 2015).”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2013

  • Electroencephalography has identified reduced proxies for information transfer linking prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex.

    “These findings support the identification of depressed surrogates of information transfer between prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex as identified by electroencephalography [142].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [142]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, U., Ku, S., Noh, G., Baek, S., Choi, B., & Mashour, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Associate Professor
  • Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Corresponding author
Mashour, George A.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2013-06
Volume
118
Issue
6
Pages
1264-1275
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137456793
Cited by
426
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 10
FWCI
42.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM098578)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024986)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
ketamine, propofol, sevoflurane, frontoparietal connectivity, feedback connectivity, feedforward connectivity, directional connectivity, symbolic transfer entropy, anesthesia induction, loss of consciousness, alpha power, gamma power, general anesthesia
MeSH terms
Sevoflurane, Adult, Analgesics, Electroencephalography, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Methyl Ethers, Middle Aged, Parietal Lobe, Propofol, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Anesthetics, Intravenous, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review