Cited by 93Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Alterations in rat brain proteins after desflurane anesthesia

Fütterer, Carsten D., Maurer, Martin H., Schmitt, Anne, Feldmann, Robert E., Kuschinsky, Wolfgang, Waschke, Klaus F.·2004·Anesthesiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics disappear from an organism after the end of anesthesia. Whether changes of protein expression persist in the brain for a longer period is not known. This study investigates the question of whether the expression of proteins is altered in the rat brain after the end of desflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Three groups (n = 12 each) of rats were anesthetized with 5.7% desflurane in air for 3 h. Brains were removed directly after anesthesia, 24 h after anesthesia, or 72 h after anesthesia. Two additional groups (n = 12 each) served as naive conscious controls, in which the brains were removed without previous anesthesia 3 or 72 h after the start of the experiment. Cytosolic proteins were isolated. A proteome-wide study was performed, based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Compared with conscious controls, significant (P < 0.05) increase/decrease was found: 3 h of anesthesia, 5/2 proteins; 24 h after anesthesia, 13/1 proteins; 72 h after anesthesia, 6/4 proteins. The overall changes in protein expression as quantified by the induction factor ranged from -1.67 (decrease to 60%) to 1.79 (increase by 79%) compared with the controls (100%). Some of these regulated proteins play a role in vesicle transport and metabolism. CONCLUSION: Desflurane anesthesia produces changes in cytosolic protein expression up to 72 h after anesthesia in the rat brain, indicating yet unknown persisting effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00019

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fütterer, C. D., Maurer, M. H., Schmitt, A., Feldmann, R. E., Kuschinsky, W., & Waschke, K. F.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim (DE)
  • Research Fellow.
  • Candidate of Medicine.
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
302-308
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028200077
Cited by
93
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
desflurane, volatile anesthetics, brain proteome, cytosolic proteins, protein expression changes, vesicle trafficking, brain metabolism, rat brain
MeSH terms
Desflurane, Anesthesia, Inhalation, Animals, Brain, Isoflurane, Male, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Rats, Wistar, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Proteome, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review