Cited by 443Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesTrauma Management and DiagnosisHealth and Conflict Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PAIN IN MEN WOUNDED IN BATTLE

BEECHER, HENRY K.·1946·Annals of Surgery

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-194601000-00008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
BEECHER, H. K.
Corresponding author
BEECHER, HENRY K.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
1946-01
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
96-105
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083726286
Cited by
443
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
war injuries, pain, men, military surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review