Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Successful Use of a Physiologically Acceptable Artificial Skin in the Treatment of Extensive Burn Injury

Open access
BURKE, JOHN F., YANNAS, IOANNIS V., QUINBY, WILLIAM C., BONDOC, CONRADO C., JUNG, WALTER K.·1981·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

A bilayer artificial skin composed of a temporary Silastic epidermis and a porous collagen-chondroitn 6-sulfate fibrillar dermis, which is not removed, has been used to physiologically close up to 60% of the body surface following prompt excision of burn wounds in ten patients whose total burn size covered 50--95% body surface area (BSA). Following grafting, the dermal portion is populated with fibroblasts and vessels from the wound bed. The anatomic structure of the artificial dermis resembles normal dermis and serves as a template for the synthesis of new connective tissue and the formation of a "neodermis," while it is slowly biodegraded. This artificial skin has physiologically closed excised burn wounds for periods of time up to 46 days before the Silastic epidermis was removed. At the time of election when donor sites are ready for reharvesting, the Silastic epidermis is removed from the vascularized artificial dermis and replaced with 0.004 autoepidermal graft in sheet or meshed form. Clinical and histologic experience in a relatively short follow-up period (2--16 months) indicates that "neodermis" retains some of the anatomic characteristics and behavior of normal dermis, thus promising improvement in the functional and cosmetic results, as well as providing physiologic function as a skin substitute. The artificial skin is easily sterilized and stored at room temperature, capable of large scale production, and immediately available for grafting, indicating its potential for easy and relatively economic use in the burn patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-198110000-00005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,250

Metadata

Authors
BURKE, J. F., YANNAS, I. V., QUINBY, W. C., BONDOC, C. C., & JUNG, W. K.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
1981-10
Volume
194
Issue
4
Pages
413-428
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006875835
Cited by
1,250
References
1
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.