Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fewer Intraperitoneal Adhesions With Use of Hyaluronic Acid–Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Vrijland, Wietske W., Tseng, Larissa N. L., Eijkman, Heert J. M., Hop, Wim C. J., Jakimowicz, Jack J., Leguit, Piet, Stassen, Laurents P. S., Swank, Dingeman J., Haverlag, Robert, Bonjer, H. Jaap, Jeekel, Hans·2002·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of bioresorbable Seprafilm membrane in preventing abdominal adhesions in a prospective clinical randomized multicenter trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Adhesions occur frequently after abdominal operations and are a common cause of bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. To reduce the formation of adhesions, a mechanical barrier composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose was developed, preventing adherence of tissues after abdominal surgery. METHODS: Between April 1996 and September 1998, all patients requiring a Hartmann procedure for sigmoid diverticulitis or obstructed rectosigmoid were randomized to either intraperitoneal placement of the antiadhesions membrane under the midline during laparotomy and in the pelvis, or as a control. Direct visual evaluation of the incidence and severity of adhesions was performed laparoscopically at second-stage surgery for restoration of the continuity of the colon. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were randomized; of these, 42 could be evaluated. The incidence of adhesions did not differ significantly between the two groups, but the severity of adhesions was significantly reduced in the Seprafilm group both for the midline incision and for the pelvic area. Complications occurred in similar numbers in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seprafilm antiadhesions membrane appears effective in reducing the severity of postoperative adhesions after major abdominal surgery, although the incidence of adhesions was not diminished. The authors recommend using Seprafilm when relaparotomy or second-look intervention is planned. Long-term studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness and value of Seprafilm in preventing bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Vrijland, W. W., Tseng, L. N. L., Eijkman, H. J. M., Hop, W. C. J., Jakimowicz, J. J., Leguit, P., Stassen, L. P. S., Swank, D. J., Haverlag, R., Bonjer, H. J., & Jeekel, H.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2002-02
Volume
235
Issue
2
Pages
193-199
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154784975
Cited by
266
References
0
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fewer Intraperitoneal Adhesions With Use of Hyaluronic Acid–Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-200202000-00006
The paper
Vrijland, W. W., Tseng, L. N. L., Eijkman, H. J. M., Hop, W. C. J., Jakimowicz, J. J., Leguit, P., Stassen, L. P. S., Swank, D. J., Haverlag, R., Bonjer, H. J., & Jeekel, H. (2002). Fewer Intraperitoneal Adhesions With Use of Hyaluronic Acid–Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200202000-00006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.